Mattermark Pricing, Reviews, Pros & Cons (2026)
Four different price points float around the internet for Mattermark - $49, $200, $500, $6,000/year - plus "custom." Some sources say the product's dead. Others show active trial buttons. Nobody bothers explaining why.
Let's sort it out.
What Happened to Mattermark?
Mattermark launched in 2012 as a company intelligence platform for investors and sales teams. It raised over $17M in venture funding, including a $7.3M Series B. Then in December 2017, it sold to FullContact for less than $1M - under $500K in cash plus a stock transaction barely above $500K. TechCrunch's reporting referenced documents describing the "liquidation of Mattermark."
What followed was confusing. FullContact initially signaled the product was going away, then reversed course. Mattermark later re-launched as an independent company - the pricing page now carries a banner stating exactly that, with active 14-day trial CTAs and self-serve plans.
Here's the thing: the site looks operational, but there's no third-party validation confirming who's actively using it in 2026 or how the data performs today. In Reddit threads on r/sales and r/startups, Mattermark didn't come up at all. That silence is a data point.
Mattermark Pricing in 2026
The conflicting prices you'll see online all trace back to Mattermark changing its pricing model over time. The $6,000/year figure was a legacy annual plan. An official Mattermark blog post confirmed the $500/month Professional plan offers full feature parity with that older offering. The $200/month Individual plan was an earlier self-serve tier that appears to have been replaced by today's Standard/Professional structure.
Here's what the current pricing page shows:
| Plan | Price | Contract | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard (in browser) | $49/user/mo | Month-to-month | In-browser access, no CSV export |
| Professional (in browser) | $500/user/mo | Annual | CSV export, full features |
| Enterprise | Custom | Annual | Team sharing, Excel + Google Sheets add-ons, dedicated account manager |
| Salesforce Data Enrichment | $49/seat/mo | Annual | 80+ data fields |
| Company & Contact Data API | $99 / $259 / $499 / $999 | Annual | 1K / 5K / 10K / 20K requests per month |
| iOS App | Free | None | No account needed |
CSV export requires the Professional plan. That's a $49-to-$500 jump just for the ability to get your data out of the platform. We found the Standard plan's browser-only access limiting within the first week of testing. Crunchbase Pro starts at the same $49/user/month, so that 10x price gap is genuinely hard to justify for most teams.
Mattermark's $500/mo Professional plan gets you CSV export. Prospeo gets you 300M+ verified contacts - 143M+ emails at 98% accuracy and 125M+ direct dials - on a 7-day refresh cycle. No annual contracts. No $49-to-$500 price jumps.
Get the contact data Mattermark never offered, starting at $0.
Honest Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Large company database with growth signals and scoring (Growth Score and Mindshare Score)
- Salesforce enrichment with 80+ data fields at $49/seat/mo
- API access with annual plans starting at $99 for 1,000 requests/month
- Low $49/mo entry point for browser-based research
- Multiple delivery formats: web app, Salesforce enrichment, Chrome extension, iOS app, and spreadsheet add-ons
Cons:
- No established review footprint on major B2B software review sites
- 10x price jump from Standard to Professional just for CSV export
- Data freshness isn't independently validated
- No clear story on contact coverage - especially direct dials - for outbound teams
- No independent confirmation of active customer base or support responsiveness
One clarification worth calling out: the "Matter" listing on G2 with 1,188 reviews is an employee recognition app - a completely different product. Don't confuse the two.
The feature set looks solid on paper. But the lack of independent validation is a red flag for any team running a procurement process.
Who Should (and Shouldn't) Use It
Consider it if you're an investor tracking private company growth signals, or a Salesforce team that wants account enrichment at $49/seat without needing CSV export.
Skip it if you need verified contact data like emails and direct dials, you require vendor confidence that passes procurement review, or you can't stomach $500/mo per user for CSV export.
Real talk: if your team needs both company intelligence and contact data, you're better off pairing two specialized tools than paying for the Professional plan. Crunchbase Pro ($49/mo) plus a dedicated contact data provider can come in far below $500/mo per user and give you more flexibility.
Better Alternatives for 2026
If you're evaluating Mattermark in 2026, you're really choosing between three paths: company intelligence, verified contact data, or an all-in-one platform.
| Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Key Strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prospeo | Verified emails & dials | Free (75 emails/month) | 98% accuracy, 125M+ verified mobile numbers |
| Crunchbase | Company & funding data | $49/user/mo | Market-standard intelligence |
| Apollo | All-in-one prospecting | $59/user/mo | Contacts + engagement |
| PitchBook | Institutional investors | ~$12K-$70K/yr | Deepest deal/fund data |
Prospeo
Mattermark gives you company data. Prospeo gives you the people at those companies - 300M+ professional profiles with 143M+ verified emails and 125M+ verified mobile numbers, all on a 7-day refresh cycle while the industry average sits at 6 weeks. Email accuracy runs 98% thanks to a proprietary 5-step verification process with catch-all handling, spam-trap removal, and honeypot filtering. The free tier includes 75 emails plus 100 Chrome extension credits per month - no credit card, no contracts.
For outbound teams, the numbers matter: a 30% mobile pickup rate means reps actually reach decision-makers, and the 92% API match rate makes CRM enrichment workflows reliable at scale. We've seen teams pair Crunchbase for company intelligence with Prospeo for contact data to cover the full workflow Mattermark once promised, at a fraction of the cost.
Crunchbase
Crunchbase Pro starts at $49/user/month. Mattermark Professional is $500/user/month on an annual contract. That 10x price gap is impossible to ignore if your main goal is company and funding research.
TrustRadius data shows Apollo scoring 8.7 on likelihood-to-recommend versus Crunchbase's 4.9 - Apollo wins on prospecting workflows, but Crunchbase remains the go-to for pure company and funding research. For anyone replacing Mattermark's company intelligence, this is the obvious first stop.
Apollo and PitchBook
Apollo combines contact data with built-in sequencing. Basic starts at $59/user/mo, Professional at $99/user/mo, with a free tier for light usage. Best for teams wanting prospecting and engagement in one platform. If you're comparing sequencing tools specifically, see Outreach alternatives.
PitchBook runs ~$12K-$70K/year and is the gold standard for institutional investors needing deep deal, fund, and LP data. Overkill for sales teams, essential for PE/VC.
Teams replacing Mattermark pair company intelligence tools with Prospeo for verified contact data. 92% API match rate for CRM enrichment, 30% mobile pickup rate so reps reach real buyers, and a free tier with 75 emails/month. No credit card required.
Stop paying $500/mo for data you can't even call.
FAQ
Is Mattermark still active in 2026?
Mattermark's pricing page is live with active trial CTAs and self-serve plans from $49/user/month. That said, no independent review coverage confirms current data quality, support responsiveness, or active user base. Request a trial before committing any budget.
Why do different sites show different prices?
Mattermark has changed pricing multiple times since launch. The $6,000/year figure was a legacy annual plan; the current $500/month Professional plan offers the same features. The $49/month Standard plan is a newer in-browser tier without CSV export.
What's the best alternative for sales teams?
For company intelligence and funding data, Crunchbase Pro at $49/user/month is the most direct replacement. For verified contact data, Prospeo offers 98% email accuracy, 125M+ verified mobiles, and a free tier with 75 emails per month - covering the outbound gap Mattermark never filled.
Does Mattermark provide direct-dial phone numbers?
Mattermark focuses on company-level data and growth signals, not individual contact information like verified emails or direct dials. Teams needing phone numbers should pair it with a dedicated contact data provider.