Ampliz vs SalesQL: Which B2B Data Tool Is Worth Your Budget?
Nobody compares Ampliz and SalesQL head-to-head. No Reddit thread, no third-party bake-off, no benchmark. We've tested both extensions and dug through every pricing page, review site, and support thread to build the comparison that doesn't exist yet. Here's what we found.
30-Second Verdict
- Pick SalesQL if you need high-volume email extraction on a budget - 2,000 credits at $39/mo is hard to beat for pure prospecting velocity.
- Pick Ampliz only if you specifically need APAC or healthcare contacts and value manual sourcing for hard-to-find prospects.
What Is Ampliz?
Ampliz isn't a typical profile-extraction tool. Its Chrome extension, SalesBuddy, works by visiting a prospect's website - not individual professional profiles - and pulling company and contact intelligence in one click. The Prospect Fit Score grades contacts against your ICP without burning credits.
The database covers 120M+ contact records and 21M+ direct dials across 7M companies, with a stated 95%+ accuracy rate - though Ampliz also publishes 98% accuracy on another page. That inconsistency isn't confidence-inspiring. Where Ampliz genuinely stands out is APAC and healthcare verticals. If a website has no contacts, you can request manual sourcing and their team will dig them up. That's unusual and legitimately useful for niche prospecting where standard databases have blind spots.
What Is SalesQL?
SalesQL is a Chrome extension built for fast contact extraction from professional profiles, and it also bundles CSV enrichment, API access, reverse lookup, an email verifier, and database prospecting via AI Search. Over 150,000 professionals across 189 countries use it, which tells you the adoption is real.
The database runs 89M personal emails, 127M work emails, and 30M phone numbers. On G2, it holds a 4.5/5 rating from 166 reviews, with users consistently praising ease of use and the extension workflow. The AI Search feature lets you prospect directly from SalesQL's database with real-time verification. Integrations cover HubSpot, Salesforce, Zapier, and Make.
Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
| Feature | Ampliz | SalesQL | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free credits | 10/mo | 100/mo | SalesQL |
| Paid starting price | $50/mo ($480/yr) | $39/mo ($29/mo billed annually) | SalesQL |
| Credits at entry tier | 100/mo | 2,000/mo (24,000/yr on annual) | SalesQL |
| Cost per credit | $0.50 | ~$0.02 (monthly), ~$0.0015 (annual) | SalesQL |
| Database size | 120M+ contacts | 216M emails + 30M phones | SalesQL |
| Accuracy | 95%+ (self-reported) | ~90% (user benchmarks) | Ampliz |
| Data refresh | 30-day re-verification | Not disclosed | Ampliz |
| Chrome extension | Yes (website-based) | Yes (profile-based) | Tie |
| API access | Not listed | Yes (600 calls/day on paid plans) | SalesQL |
| CSV enrichment limits | N/A | 1,000-50,000 rows/file by tier | SalesQL |
| Key integrations | Limited | HubSpot, Salesforce, Zapier, Make | SalesQL |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA | GDPR | Ampliz |
| Seats included | 1 | 1 (Basic), 3 (Professional) | SalesQL |
Ampliz is roughly 26x more expensive per credit than SalesQL's monthly Basic plan - and the gap widens dramatically on annual billing. At $0.50/credit, Ampliz's 100 credits/mo gives you enough data for maybe one afternoon of prospecting. For any team doing volume outbound, that math simply doesn't work.
Ampliz costs 26x more per credit than SalesQL - and neither publishes a 7-day data refresh cycle. Prospeo gives you 300M+ profiles at 98% email accuracy, refreshed weekly, for roughly $0.01 per email. No restrictive credit caps, no mystery refresh dates.
Stop overpaying for stale data. See the difference in one search.
Key Differences That Matter
Pricing at Real-World Volume
Here's where the comparison gets brutal for Ampliz. At 2,000 contacts/month - a typical SDR workload - Ampliz's list price implies about $1,000/month worth of credits (100 credits for $50, so you'd need to buy 20x that). SalesQL costs $39/mo on the monthly Basic plan, or $29/mo billed annually.
One frustration worth flagging: SalesQL's pricing page is genuinely confusing. It mixes monthly and annual pricing, and it also references semi-annual API limits in the same view. The G2 pricing snapshot from October 2024 shows different plan names and credit counts than the current site. Confirm your plan details before committing.
Data Quality and Freshness
Ampliz's 30-day re-verification cycle is at least documented. SalesQL doesn't publish a refresh cycle at all. On Trustpilot, SalesQL holds a 3.8/5 from 9 reviews, with reviewers putting email accuracy around 90% - respectable, but phone numbers are a weak spot. Multiple reviews flag getting company main lines instead of direct dials, which kills connect rates.
In our experience, the accuracy gap matters less than the freshness gap. A 95%-accurate email verified 30 days ago will outperform a 90%-accurate email with no disclosed refresh date. Neither tool matches the 7-day refresh cycle we've seen from top-tier platforms.
Workflow Differences
These tools solve prospecting differently. SalesQL is profile-first: browse professional profiles, click the extension, get emails and phones. It's fast and intuitive for reps who already know who they want to reach.
Ampliz is website-first: visit a prospect's company site, and SalesBuddy surfaces company and contact intelligence. If the data doesn't exist, you can request manual sourcing. That's a slower workflow but more thorough for niche verticals where standard databases have gaps. For most B2B teams running outbound at scale, the profile-first approach wins on speed. But if you're targeting a narrow vertical like hospital systems in Southeast Asia, Ampliz's manual sourcing is genuinely hard to replicate elsewhere.
What Users Say
SalesQL gets praise for its fast extension workflow and easy email extraction. The criticism centers on occasionally outdated data, poor customer support response times, and billing frustration - including refund complaints and export access issues after cancellation.
Ampliz earns respect for healthcare and APAC data depth, manual sourcing, and the Prospect Fit Score. The downside: it's rated 4.2/5 on G2, and the credit limits feel restrictive for anyone doing real outbound volume.
Here's the thing: if your outbound motion requires more than 200 contacts per month - and most do - Ampliz isn't really a prospecting tool. It's a research tool priced like a prospecting tool. That mismatch is the core problem.
A Stronger Alternative to Both
If SalesQL's weak phone data or Ampliz's restrictive credits are dealbreakers, Prospeo fills both gaps. The database covers 300M+ profiles with 98% email accuracy on a 7-day refresh cycle, directly solving the freshness questions both tools leave unanswered.
For teams frustrated by SalesQL's phone quality, Prospeo offers 125M+ verified mobile numbers with a 30% pickup rate - direct dials, not company switchboards. The free tier gives you 75 emails and 100 Chrome extension credits monthly, more generous than either competitor. Self-serve, no contracts, native integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Lemlist, Instantly, and Clay.
SalesQL users flag company switchboards instead of direct dials. Ampliz caps you at 100 credits for $50/mo. Prospeo's 125M+ verified mobiles hit a 30% pickup rate - real direct dials, not front desks - with a free tier to prove it.
Get direct dials that actually connect, not switchboard dead ends.
Verdict: Ampliz vs SalesQL
SalesQL wins for solo SDRs and small teams running high-volume email outbound on a tight budget. The annual plan's credit economics are genuinely strong. Accept the weaker phone data and confusing pricing page as tradeoffs.
Ampliz wins for healthcare and APAC specialists who need contacts that don't exist in standard databases and will pay a premium for manual sourcing. If you're prospecting outside those verticals, skip it.
FAQ
Is SalesQL free?
Yes. SalesQL offers a free plan with 100 credits and 100 email verifier credits per month. Paid plans start at $39/mo, or $29/mo on annual billing.
Does Ampliz work outside healthcare and APAC?
Ampliz offers a "Global B2B" mode, but its strongest coverage and differentiators - manual sourcing, Prospect Fit Score, deep vertical data - are built around APAC and healthcare. General B2B teams will find the 100 credits/mo ceiling frustrating and the $0.50/credit cost prohibitive at scale.
Which tool has the best phone numbers?
Neither excels here. SalesQL reviews repeatedly flag company main lines showing up instead of direct dials. Ampliz publishes 21M+ direct dials but has limited third-party validation. If direct dials are critical to your outbound motion, look for a platform with 100M+ verified mobiles and published pickup rates - that's the benchmark that actually moves connect rates.