Ampliz vs Tomba: Sales Intelligence Database vs Email Finder
The Ampliz vs Tomba decision isn't apples-to-apples. One's a vertical sales intelligence database, the other is an email discovery platform. Comparing them is like comparing a library to a search engine - they solve different problems, and picking the wrong one wastes months of budget before you realize the mismatch. We've evaluated both, and here's what actually matters.
30-Second Verdict
Choose Ampliz if you need a pre-built B2B contact database with deep healthcare targeting and strong APAC coverage - and you're buying lists, not hunting individual emails.
Choose Tomba if you need a fast, affordable email finder with pay-only-when-found economics and bulk operations up to 10K emails per run.
What Each Tool Actually Does
Ampliz is a B2B data intelligence platform built around verticals. Its strongest play is healthcare - physician directories, HCP data, specialty filters - and it also offers APAC data intelligence. Community estimates peg Ampliz at roughly $29M in revenue, putting it squarely in the mid-market vertical data provider category. If you're selling into healthcare organizations or targeting DACH-region companies, Ampliz has a real niche. Outside those verticals? Coverage drops off fast.
Tomba is an email discovery platform, not a database. It indexes 400M+ emails and lets you search by domain, find individual addresses, verify in bulk, enrich contacts, and run phone-finding workflows. The founder has shared that Tomba pulls 150-200 signups per day with 60,600+ free users - solid traction for a self-serve email tool. But it's a finder, not a prospecting database with filters and intent signals.
Feature Comparison
| Category | Ampliz | Tomba |
|---|---|---|
| Data Type | B2B contact database | Email discovery platform |
| Core Workflow | List building + filtering | Domain search + email finding |
| Best For | Healthcare, APAC | Domain search, bulk email ops |
| Key Regions | APAC, DACH | Global (quality varies) |
| Integrations | Not prominently listed | Zapier, Make, n8n, Apify |
| Chrome Extension | Yes | Yes |
| Bulk Operations | Enrichment/append & data cleaning | Up to 10K per operation |
| API Access | Yes | Yes |
| G2 Rating | 4.2/5 (7 reviews) | 4.7/5 (25 reviews) |
The G2 gap looks significant, but Ampliz has just 7 reviews. Tomba's 25 reviews skew 84% five-star - still a small sample for either tool, so take both ratings with a grain of salt.
Pricing and Credit Economics
| Plan | Tomba (Yearly) | Ampliz |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (25 searches) | $0 (10 free credits) |
| Entry Paid | $441/yr | $50/mo ($480/yr) |
| Mid-Tier | $801-$1,791/yr | ~$99-$499/mo (est.) |
| Top Tier | $4,041/yr | Custom ($10K+/yr est.) |
Tomba's credit rules are genuinely fair. Domain searches count per 10 emails returned - no result, no charge. Email finder requests only count when they find something. Repeated identical requests count once per billing period. For teams running large prospecting lists with variable hit rates, that's a meaningful advantage over flat-fee models that burn credits on misses.
Ampliz starts at $50/mo and includes 100 credits per month. For bulk exports and serious sales intelligence, expect pricing closer to $99-$499/month for SMB packages, scaling higher for enterprise.
Here's the thing: if your average deal size sits below $15K and you're not selling into healthcare, neither tool justifies the spend. You're better off with a general-purpose data enrichment platform that covers more ground per dollar.
Neither Ampliz's healthcare niche nor Tomba's domain-search model covers full-cycle outbound. Prospeo combines 143M+ verified emails at 98% accuracy with 125M+ mobile numbers - refreshed every 7 days, not 6 weeks. Starting at ~$0.01 per email, no contracts.
Stop stitching tools together. One platform, verified data, weekly refresh.
Accuracy and Deliverability
A Reddit bake-off testing 8 email finders on the same 2,500 contacts showed Tomba at 76.9% valid emails (1,922 found) with no manual cleanup - beating Findymail (75.2%), GetProspect (64.6%), and Hunter (35.5%) in the same test.
Raw match rates don't tell the full story, though. The Dropcontact benchmark tested 15 tools on 20,000 contacts and makes a strong case that real enrichment rate should subtract hard bounces and wrong-domain matches. Live-send testing is the only way to know for sure.
For Ampliz, no independent accuracy benchmark exists. G2 reviewers praise verified emails and direct dials for the DACH region specifically, but with only 7 reviews, that's anecdotal at best.
What Real Users Say
Tomba pros: Bulk operations, pay-only-for-found model, responsive support, solid Chrome extension. The r/coldemail consensus is that it's cheap and useful for domain searches. Tomba cons: Quality varies by industry, it can't find Gmail addresses even when they're listed on a website, and users want more native integrations.
Ampliz pros: Healthcare targeting is genuinely strong, DACH data quality gets specific praise, and vertical filters work well for that niche. Ampliz cons: The UI feels outdated - exporting takes too many clicks, and coverage is much weaker outside its core verticals. One G2 reviewer put it bluntly: it "doesn't work for any other market except for healthcare."
Let's be honest - if you're not in healthcare or APAC sales, Ampliz probably isn't the tool you're looking for.
When Neither Tool Fits
If you've read this far and realized the Ampliz vs Tomba comparison is a category mismatch for your needs, you're not alone. We've talked to plenty of teams who tried stitching together a vertical database and a standalone email finder before realizing they needed one platform that does both well.
Prospeo delivers 143M+ verified emails at 98% accuracy and 125M+ verified mobiles on a 7-day refresh cycle. The free tier includes 75 emails/month; paid plans start at roughly $0.01 per email with no contracts. Ampliz goes deep on healthcare. Tomba goes lean on email finding. Prospeo gives you the verified enrichment layer that powers outbound sequences without burning domains - one customer, Stack Optimize, built from $0 to $1M ARR while keeping client deliverability above 94% and bounce rates under 3%.
Tomba hit 76.9% valid emails in that Reddit bake-off. Prospeo delivers 98% accuracy with 5-step verification, catch-all handling, and spam-trap removal - so your domain stays clean. Stack Optimize kept bounce rates under 3% while scaling to $1M ARR.
Get 98% email accuracy and protect your sender reputation from day one.
Ampliz vs Tomba FAQ
Does Tomba charge for searches that return nothing?
No. Domain Search is counted every 10 email addresses returned, and Email Finder is counted per email found. If there's no result, you aren't charged. Repeated identical requests count once per billing period.
Is Ampliz only useful for healthcare?
Healthcare is the strongest vertical, but Ampliz also covers APAC and DACH B2B data. Coverage for smaller companies outside these regions and verticals is noticeably weaker - one G2 reviewer called it unusable outside healthcare.
What's the most accurate email finder in 2026?
Prospeo delivers 98% email accuracy with a 5-step verification process and 7-day data refresh cycle. When evaluating any tool, check for wrong-domain rates and live-send bounce testing - not just raw match rates.
Can I use Tomba and Ampliz together?
You can, but it's redundant for most teams. Tomba finds emails by domain; Ampliz provides pre-built contact lists. A single platform with 300M+ profiles, 30+ search filters, and built-in verification replaces both workflows at a fraction of the combined cost.