GetProspect vs Mattermark: Different Tools, Different Jobs
You're comparing an email finder to a company intelligence platform. That's the core issue with any GetProspect vs Mattermark comparison - it's like asking whether a hammer is better than a thermometer. They don't do the same thing. GetProspect finds contact emails for outbound prospecting. Mattermark tracks firmographics, funding rounds, VC portfolio data, and company news. If someone told you these are competitors, they're wrong.
30-second verdict: If you need verified B2B emails for outbound, GetProspect wins this "comparison" by default - but Prospeo is the stronger email finder, with 98% email accuracy, 300M+ profiles, and a more generous free tier. If you need company intelligence, skip both and look at Crunchbase or PitchBook.
What Is Mattermark?
Mattermark had a rough ride. It marketed itself as a company intelligence platform offering 80+ data points across 4 million companies, plus funding data, saved lists, and recent company news.
Then in 2017, FullContact acquired it for less than $1M total - under $500K in cash - and shut down Mattermark's standalone business. Six employees came along. The rest of the team was let go.
A relaunch narrative appeared in 2019 describing Mattermark as back and independent, but the details around that return were murky. FullContact first said the product was going away, then said it was still available. In our experience, tools with this kind of ownership turbulence tend to stagnate on product development, and Mattermark fits that pattern perfectly.
Today, Mattermark's pricing page is live. Standard plans start at $49/user/month, Professional at $500/user/month on an annual contract, and API access runs from $99/month to $999/month depending on request volume. There's a free iOS app too. The current $49 Standard tier is a significant price drop from its earlier $200/month self-serve plan. But modern reviews are scarce, the turbulent history makes it a risky primary intelligence tool, and if you need company data in 2026, more established options exist.
What Is GetProspect?
GetProspect is a straightforward email finder with a 200M+ contact database, Chrome extension, and built-in email verification. It does one job - find emails for outbound - and it's a common pick for small teams on a budget.
The tool scores a 4.0/5 on G2 from 41 reviews and 4.2/5 on Trustpilot from 9 reviews. Users like the Chrome extension workflow and the affordability compared to bigger platforms.
The complaints are worth paying attention to, though. Here's what comes up repeatedly:
- Database coverage falls short of larger tools
- Support quality gets flagged - some users describe rude responses and account approval issues
- Quota limits aren't clearly communicated upfront, leading to surprise restrictions
- Email accuracy is inconsistent, with some users reporting higher-than-expected bounce rates
- Exports can be slower than competitors because GetProspect opens every page during extraction
We ran a 200-contact test list through GetProspect and saw bounce rates above the 5% threshold most deliverability-conscious teams target. Not catastrophic, but enough to erode sender reputation over time if you're running any real volume.
GetProspect's bounce rates erode your sender reputation. Prospeo's 5-step verification delivers 98% email accuracy across 300M+ profiles - with data refreshed every 7 days, not every 6 weeks. At ~$0.01/email, you pay less and bounce less.
Replace inconsistent email data with contacts you can actually send to.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| GetProspect | Mattermark | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Email finder | Company intelligence | Different tools |
| Database focus | Contact emails & phones | Firmographics, funding data, company news | Different tools |
| Database size | 200M+ contacts | 4M+ companies | Different tools |
| Entry price | Free (50 valid emails/mo) | $49/user/mo | GetProspect (free tier) |
| Best for | Outbound email prospecting | Investor research | Different tools |
| Chrome extension | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| CRM integrations | HubSpot, Salesforce | Salesforce | GetProspect (more options) |
| Review rating | 4.0/5 (G2, 41 reviews) | Limited modern reviews | GetProspect (by volume) |
Look - this table is almost misleading because these tools don't compete. You'd never evaluate them side by side for the same use case. GetProspect helps you find someone's email. Mattermark helps you understand a company's funding history. Completely different workflows, completely different buyers.
What You Actually Need
Let's split this into the two paths that make sense.
If you need company intelligence - funding data, company news, firmographic research - Mattermark is one option, but Crunchbase and PitchBook are where most teams have landed. Platforms like Dealroom and Tracxn also cover the startup intelligence space with more active development and larger user communities. Given Mattermark's history, it's a risky bet for a primary data source.
If you need verified emails for outbound - this is where the real decision lives, and where we've spent the most time testing tools. GetProspect works for light-volume prospecting, but it struggles at scale. Prospeo's database covers 300M+ profiles with 98% email accuracy through a proprietary 5-step verification process, and data refreshes every 7 days instead of the 6-week industry average. The free tier gives you 75 emails/month compared to GetProspect's 50, and at roughly $0.01/email, the unit economics are hard to beat. No annual contracts, no sales calls - just self-serve access.
Here's our honest take: most teams searching for this comparison don't actually need either tool. They need an email finder that won't torch their domain reputation with bad data, and a company intelligence source that's actively maintained. That means pairing a strong email finder with Crunchbase - not hunting for a single platform that tries to do both.
Pricing Breakdown
| Tool | Free Tier | Starter Paid | Mid Tier | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GetProspect | 50 valid emails/mo | $49/mo (1K emails) | $99/mo (5K emails) | Credit-based pricing |
| Mattermark | Free iOS app | $49/user/mo | $500/user/mo (annual) | Per-user pricing |
GetProspect's credit-based model is straightforward for solo prospectors. Mattermark's per-user pricing at the Professional tier gets expensive fast - a 5-person team would run $2,500/month before touching the API.
For email finding specifically, we've seen teams cut their cost-per-verified-contact by 80%+ by switching to credit-based tools that charge only for valid results. One of our customers, Stack Optimize, built from $0 to $1M ARR while maintaining client deliverability above 94% and bounce rates under 3% - the kind of numbers that aren't possible when your email finder is feeding you unverified data.
If you're building a modern outbound stack, it also helps to map your tooling to your workflow (data, sequencing, and ops) - our breakdown of SDR tools is a good starting point.
Stack Optimize built a $1M agency on Prospeo data - under 3% bounce rates, 94%+ deliverability, zero domain flags. GetProspect's 200M database can't match 300M+ profiles with proprietary verification. No contracts, no sales calls.
Stop comparing tools that don't compete - upgrade to one that delivers.
FAQ
Is Mattermark still active in 2026?
Mattermark's pricing page lists plans from $49/user/month, but the platform was acquired for under $1M in 2017 and shut down as a standalone business before a murky 2019 relaunch. Modern reviews are extremely scarce. For company intelligence, Crunchbase is the safer choice with a much larger active user base.
Can GetProspect replace Mattermark?
No. They're entirely different tools. GetProspect finds contact emails for outbound sales. Mattermark tracks company-level data like funding rounds and firmographics. For company intelligence, use Crunchbase or PitchBook. For email finding, use a dedicated tool with strong verification.
What's the best email finder in 2026?
Prospeo leads the category with 98% email accuracy, 300M+ profiles, and 125M+ verified mobile numbers on a 7-day data refresh cycle. The free tier includes 75 emails/month with no credit card required. For teams that prioritize deliverability and data freshness, it's the strongest option at any price point.