GetProspect vs Revli: They're Not Competitors - Here's What to Actually Use
Someone mentioned Revli and now you're wondering if it replaces GetProspect. Short answer: it doesn't. Comparing GetProspect vs Revli is like comparing a Swiss Army knife to a corkscrew - one is a general-purpose B2B email finder with 200M+ contacts, the other is a curated database of recently funded startups and investors with around 80k leads updated weekly updated weekly. They're built for completely different buyers.
Let's break down what each one actually does so you can pick the right tool. Or skip both.
30-Second Verdict
Selling to funded startups? Revli. Its curated funding intelligence is something general email finders can't replicate.
Need general B2B emails at scale? GetProspect works, but accuracy is shaky. A Snov.io extraction test found emails for only 5 out of 10 profiles.
Skip both if you need verified emails across a broad total addressable market with high deliverability. There are stronger options - more on that below.
What Is GetProspect?
GetProspect is a B2B contact database and Chrome extension that finds emails from web sources and its own 200M+ contact database. It bundles bulk email finding, verification, a built-in CRM, and cold email sequencing. On paper, it's an all-in-one prospecting stack at a budget price point.
Use this if you're a small team that needs a cheap, self-serve email finder with a decent free plan (50 valid emails/month). We found the Chrome extension genuinely easy to set up - smooth install, intuitive interface, no learning curve worth mentioning. Pricing starts at $49/month for 1,000 valid emails plus 2,000 verifications, which is hard to beat on cost alone.
Skip this if email accuracy is critical to your outreach. GetProspect claims 95% accuracy, but G2 reviewers tell a different story. The tool sits at 4.0/5 across 41 reviews, and while people praise the Chrome extension's simplicity, bounces come up again and again. That Snov.io extraction test pulling emails for just 5 out of 10 profiles? That's a coin flip. If you're running high-volume sequences, those bounces will torch your domain reputation fast.
What Is Revli?
Revli isn't an email finder. It's a funded-startup and investor intelligence database - a deal-signal tool that tracks recent funding rounds globally across the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Oceania, surfaces founder and decision-maker contacts, and refreshes weekly. The database lists 80k+ leads on the production site, though a staging version showed 55k+, which suggests active growth. That's tiny compared to general B2B tools. That's also the point. Every record is a recently funded company or active investor.
Use this if you're an agency or service provider selling to post-funding startups, or a founder looking for investors who are actively writing checks. The funding-round filters, hiring insights, and tech-stack signals are purpose-built for this workflow.
Skip this if you need broad B2B coverage. Revli's gated access model - you submit a request and they review it - adds friction if you just want emails today. There's also almost no third-party review coverage on G2 or Capterra and very little public discussion on Reddit, so you're betting on a product with limited outside validation. Revli's help center includes sections on connecting inboxes, warmup settings, and DNS configuration, hinting at an outreach workflow, though it's unclear how much is fully built into the product versus documented as best practices.
GetProspect pulled emails for 5 out of 10 profiles. Revli caps you at 80k leads. Prospeo delivers 98% verified emails across 300M+ profiles with a 7-day data refresh - no access gates, no coin-flip accuracy.
Stop choosing between niche data and bad data. Get both breadth and accuracy.
Feature Comparison
| Database | 200M+ B2B contacts | 80k+ funded leads | 300M+ profiles |
| Data Focus | General B2B | Startups + investors | General B2B |
| Email Accuracy | Claims 95%; 5/10 in extraction test | No public benchmarks | 98% verified |
| Entry Price | $49/mo (Starter) | $69/mo annual (Growth) | ~$0.01/email |
| Free Tier | 50 valid emails/mo | 7-day trial (10 leads) | 75 emails/mo |
| Data Refresh | Not disclosed | Weekly | Every 7 days |
| Best For | Budget email finding | Funded-startup outreach | Verified emails at scale |
The table makes the apples-to-oranges problem obvious. Revli and GetProspect aren't competing for the same buyer. Revli wins on funding intelligence; GetProspect wins on breadth and price.
Here's our hot take: if your average deal size is under $15k, you probably don't need Revli's funding-signal layer at all. A general email finder with strong accuracy will outperform a niche database you only half-use.
Pricing Breakdown
GetProspect runs a straightforward credit model. Free gets you 50 valid emails/month. Starter is $49/month for 1,000 valid emails. Growth tiers scale up: $99/month for 5,000 emails, $199/month for 20,000, and $399/month for 50,000. Annual billing knocks 30% off.
Revli prices by access level, not email volume. For sales teams and agencies, Growth starts at $69/month on annual billing or $99/month if you pay monthly, but it doesn't include CSV export - you'll need Pro at $124/month (annual) for that. All Access runs $140/month (annual) and bundles startup plus investor data. Founders raising capital pay $55/month (annual) for the Investor plan. The 7-day trial unlocks just 10 funded startups on the sales/agency track, or 10 investors on the founder track.
Look, comparing these prices directly is misleading. GetProspect charges per email found. Revli charges for access to a curated intelligence layer. They're different products solving different problems, and the pricing reflects that.
If Neither Fits
Beyond raw email finding, Prospeo offers 30+ search filters including buyer intent powered by Bombora across 15,000 topics, technographics, job change signals, and headcount growth. That gives you targeting precision that neither GetProspect nor Revli can match across a general B2B audience. One agency client, Stack Optimize, built from $0 to $1M ARR while maintaining 94%+ deliverability and sub-3% bounce rates across every campaign - the kind of result that's only possible when the underlying data is actually clean.
Stack Optimize built a $1M agency on Prospeo data - 94%+ deliverability, sub-3% bounces, zero domain flags. At ~$0.01 per email with 30+ filters including funding signals and buyer intent, you don't need two tools to cover what one handles.
75 free emails. No credit card. No sales call. No waiting for access approval.
FAQ
Is Revli an email finder like GetProspect?
No. Revli is a funded-startup and investor intelligence database, not a general B2B email finder. It includes verified contacts for startup founders and investors, but its 80k+ lead database is purpose-built for funding-round signals. If you need emails across industries and roles, use a broader tool.
Can GetProspect track recently funded startups?
Not directly. GetProspect's filters cover job title, industry, location, and company size, but it doesn't track funding rounds, investor activity, or post-raise hiring signals. Revli is purpose-built for that specific use case. Prospeo bridges the gap with funding filters among its 30+ search criteria, so teams that want both breadth and deal signals don't need two separate subscriptions.
Which tool has better email accuracy?
Neither inspires confidence. GetProspect claims 95% but only found emails for 5 out of 10 profiles in a third-party extraction test. Revli has no public accuracy benchmarks at all. If deliverability matters - and it should, because bounced emails from stale records are the fastest way to tank a sending domain - Prospeo's 98% verified accuracy with a 7-day refresh cycle is the strongest option we've tested.
What's a good free alternative to both tools?
Prospeo's free tier gives you 75 emails plus 100 Chrome extension credits per month. That's more generous than GetProspect's 50 emails and far more accessible than Revli's gated 10-lead trial. For small teams running real outbound on a budget, it's the strongest no-cost starting point across all three options.