Humanlinker pricing (2026): What you'll really pay

€69/month. €49/user/month. $75/month. $800/month.

If you've Googled Humanlinker pricing, you've probably seen all of them, then wasted 20 minutes trying to figure out which one isn't outdated.

Here's the clean way to think about it: the seat price is the easy part. The real bill is seats + AI credit burn + enrichment packs + annual prepay + VAT. Miss any one of those, and your "€69/month tool" turns into a budget surprise.

Humanlinker pricing snapshot (2026)

If you're only going to remember one line, make it this:

Pro is listed at €69/mo billed annually (so €828/yr, excl. VAT) for one user.

Quick checklist:

• ✅ Pro list price: €69/mo billed annually = €828/yr excl. VAT (1 user)
• ✅ The official pricing page pushes annual billing for Pro (marketplaces often show monthly/older tiers)
• ✅ Team plans (Business): quote-based; for small teams, $500-$1,500/mo is a realistic planning range
• ✅ Enterprise: plan for $15k-$60k/yr once security, procurement, and higher quotas show up
• ✅ Overages usually aren't "extra seats" - they're AI credit top-ups + enrichment packs
• ✅ The pricing page can show different currencies depending on region

Mini table (the parts that drive true cost):

The seat price is the easy part.

The usage is what gets you.

A concrete baseline (what a lot of people do in month one): 1 Pro seat (€828/yr) + 1 email pack (€30) + 1 phone pack (€47) = €905 excl. VAT for the year, plus a starter set of enrichment credits to actually run the workflow.

Plans and packaging: Pro vs Business vs Enterprise

Humanlinker's current packaging is pretty simple on the official site: Pro is €69/mo billed annually, and Business/Enterprise are quote-based.

In practice, the plan choice usually comes down to two things: connected accounts and how fast you burn credits.

Two things drive why teams pay for Humanlinker in the first place:

1. DISC-based personality insights. This isn't fluff. It changes the angle and the copy, and it tends to increase output volume because reps generate more variants and more sequences.

2. Connected-account limits on Pro. Pro's 2 email + 1 social account cap is the quiet tripwire. The moment you need multiple inboxes, inbox rotation, or separate identities per rep, you're negotiating a team plan whether you like it or not.

In our experience, this is where budgets blow up: someone buys Pro thinking it's "one seat," then two weeks later the team wants shared workflows, more accounts, and higher quotas, and suddenly you're in a quote conversation.

Verdict #1: If you're solo, Pro annual is the only number that matters: €828/yr + packs.

Free trial (14 days): what you can actually validate

Humanlinker's trial is 14 days, no card.

That's enough time to answer the only question that matters: will reps keep using it after the novelty wears off?

Use the trial to test these six things:

• ✅ Can you get value with the included limits: 30 email enrichment credits, 180 AI recommendations, 30 AI credits, 30 Chrome extension analyses?
• ✅ Does it fit your real workflow with 1 social account, 1 email inbox, 1 calendar connected?
• ✅ Do the AI sequences sound like your reps (tight, specific, on-brand), or like generic "AI outbound"?
• ✅ Do recommendations match your ICP, or do they drift into "close enough" leads?
• ✅ Can you operationalize it (templates, approvals, guardrails) without RevOps babysitting it?
• ✅ Do replies land cleanly in the unified inbox and stay manageable?

A 14-day trial won't prove long-term deliverability or data freshness. It will prove whether the workflow clicks and whether the team can run it without constant hand-holding.

AI credits: the real cost driver (and how to forecast it)

This is where Humanlinker pricing gets slippery: credits turn usage into spend, and usage tends to creep.

The rules are simple:

• 1 credit = 1 outbound sequence generated
• 3 credits = 1 meeting prep

So the question isn't "How many seats?" It's "How many AI actions per rep per month?"

Sanity-check examples:

• Light usage (founder-led outbound): 10 sequences/week = ~40 credits/month
• Normal SDR usage: 5 sequences/day = ~100 credits/month
• High usage (agency / aggressive outbound): you can burn a month's allocation in days if you generate lots of variants and multi-step sequences

Now the annoying part: AI top-up pricing isn't published as one clean menu because it's often bundled into team quotes or sold as add-ons.

You still need a planning number, though. When I've seen teams forecast credit-based tools well, they pick a conservative per-action cost and treat it like cloud spend: budget it, monitor it, and cap it.

Budgeting model: for credit-based AI tools, overage often lands around $0.20-$1.00 per AI action equivalent depending on volume and plan. If you need a single number for a spreadsheet, use $0.50/action until you get a real quote. At 100 sequences/month, that's $50/rep/month in AI usage before enrichment.

Here's the thing: if you don't set a credit budget per rep, you'll pay for infinite drafts. AI should generate v1; humans should ship v2.

Verdict #2: If you need SSO/MFA, assume Enterprise pricing and stop trying to budget off €69.

Skip/Use rules that actually save money:

• Use Humanlinker when you're running personalization at scale and meeting prep will get used weekly.
• Skip Humanlinker when your main goal is contact data. Buying an AI copilot for data is the most expensive way to get emails.

Enrichment add-ons: rollover rules and effective cost per contact

Enrichment is where "€69/mo" turns into "why is my bill climbing?"

The add-on packs (and rollover)

Both are shared across the workspace, which is exactly how it should be for teams.

Why phones are expensive (and why that's normal)

Humanlinker enrichment runs through FullEnrich's provider waterfall (15 data providers). That's why results vary by region and industry, and it's also why phone numbers cost more: good mobile data is harder to source and validate than email.

FullEnrich has shared an ~80% average find rate across its network, but it varies a lot by market. So your effective cost per usable contact depends on your ICP, your geo, and how strict you are about "usable" (mobile vs HQ line, correct title, etc.).

The math you can rely on:

• Emails: €0.06 per enriched email via pack pricing.
• Phones: €0.47 per number is the sticker price; your real cost depends on how many targets return a usable mobile.

Verdict #3: If enrichment is your primary use, don't buy an AI copilot for data. Buy a data layer. Tools like Prospeo are built for predictable cost per usable contact, and you can keep your sequencing/personalization stack separate.

Why pricing differs across sites (and what number to budget with)

You're seeing multiple versions of Humanlinker at once: official packaging, marketplace tiers, and old comparisons that never got updated.

What you'll typically find:

• Official site: Pro at €69/mo billed annually (€828/yr excl. VAT), plus Business/Enterprise quote-based. This is the 2026 baseline.
• G2: multiple "Pro" tiers (often shown as monthly) and a "Team" tier that's Contact Us; it also shows a "last updated" timestamp that can lag behind current packaging.
• Capterra / GetApp: "starting at €49/user/month" fields that often trail real plan changes.
• Random listicles: numbers like $800/mo that don't match the current plan structure.

So what should you budget?

• Solo: €828/yr + VAT, then add enrichment packs.
• Team (5-10 users): $500-$1,500/mo as a planning range because you're in quote territory once you need shared quotas, higher usage, and real support.
• Security/procurement involved: $15k-$60k/yr.

Hot take, and yeah, I'm opinionated about this: if your outbound motion's still messy, annual contracts for AI workflow tools are a trap. Prove reply rates and process discipline first, then commit.

What teams actually budget (true monthly cost scenarios)

Stop arguing with pricing pages and run scenarios.

Assumptions:

• Pro is annual prepay
• Enrichment packs are the most common overage
• AI top-ups exist (even if the vendor doesn't publish a neat menu)
• VAT can change the out-the-door number if you don't reclaim it

Two practical notes people forget:

• Annual prepay changes the buying conversation. Even if the monthly equivalent looks fine, finance cares about the upfront cash, and that can kill a rollout faster than any feature gap.
• Connection limits drive upgrades. Pro's connected-account caps push teams into higher tiers sooner than they expect, especially if they run multiple inboxes or want separate identities for different segments.

I've seen this exact scenario play out: a founder buys one Pro seat, loves it, then tries to roll it out to three SDRs. Week one is fine. Week two turns into "we need more accounts, more credits, and shared workflows," and now you're redoing the budget mid-quarter. It's not the vendor's fault, but it is predictable.

Cancellation, refunds, and "worth it" sanity checks

The terms that matter

• Cancellation: you can cancel from the dashboard.
• Price changes: Humanlinker gives a 30-day notice window for pricing changes.
• Refunds: no, except an exceptional pro-rata window (5-10 days) when upgrading to a higher annual offer.

The "worth it" sanity checks (real talk)

Humanlinker is worth paying for when you're buying personalization + workflow speed, not when you're buying "a database."

Before you commit to annual billing, check three things in your own test (not in a demo):

• Data fit for your market: if your trial sends show bounce risk or coverage gaps in your geo/industry, your enrichment spend will climb.
• Analytics depth: if you need serious optimization, basic stats will feel limiting fast.
• Support responsiveness: slow support is tolerable for a solo tool; it breaks team rollouts.

A clean alternative when your cost problem is data (Prospeo)

If your cost problem is "we're paying for enrichment and still fighting bounces," separate the layers: keep your sequencing/personalization tool, and switch to a dedicated data platform for verified contacts.

We've tested this split-stack approach with outbound teams, and it usually makes the budget calmer: you get a predictable cost per usable contact, and you stop paying "AI tool prices" for what is basically data plumbing.

Prospeo ("The B2B data platform built for accuracy") is a top pick here because it's built around 98% verified email accuracy and a 7-day refresh cycle (industry average: 6 weeks), with self-serve pricing and no contracts. It includes 300M+ professional profiles, 143M+ verified emails, and 125M+ verified mobile numbers, plus a Chrome extension used by 40,000+ people and a platform used by 15,000+ companies.

If you want the Humanlinker workflow, budget for credits + packs from day one. If you want predictable cost per usable contact, split data from AI and keep your enrichment economics under control, because that's the part of Humanlinker pricing that sneaks up on teams.