ReachStream vs SalesQL: Which B2B Data Tool Is Worth Your Money?
Two tools, similar price points, very different approaches. ReachStream gives you a standalone database. SalesQL is a Chrome extension for enriching professional profiles on the fly. The right pick depends entirely on how you prospect - so let's break down what actually matters.
30-Second Verdict
Pick ReachStream if you want a standalone B2B database with strong user satisfaction (4.8/5 on G2 from 52 reviews). It's the safer bet for teams building lists from scratch.
Pick SalesQL if you're a solo rep or recruiter who prospects on professional profiles and needs cheap, fast enrichment. It scores 4.5/5 on G2 from 166 reviews, though Capterra paints a rougher picture.
Skip both if data freshness and verified accuracy are non-negotiable. Neither tool refreshes data frequently enough to keep pace with the roughly 30% annual decay rate of B2B contact records.
What Each Tool Does
ReachStream is a self-contained B2B data platform. You search its database of 200M+ contacts and 15M+ companies, filter by title, industry, or technographics, and export verified leads. It includes built-in email verification and API access - and while it also offers a Chrome extension, you don't need an extension to use the core database.
SalesQL takes the opposite approach. Its Chrome extension enriches profiles as you browse them, pulling from a database of 89M personal emails, 127M work emails, and 30M phone numbers. It also offers CSV enrichment and an API, but the extension is what most users actually buy it for.
Pricing Side by Side
Both tools land in the same ballpark, but they meter usage differently.
ReachStream
| Plan | Price | Exports/Month | Seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Icebreaker (Free) | $0 | 200 email views + 100 exports | 1 |
| Glacier | $39/mo ($29/mo annual) | 5,000 | 1 |
| Ice Floe | $59/mo ($49/mo annual) | 10,000 | 1 |
| Polar Peak | $99/mo ($79/mo annual) | 20,000 | 1 |
| Frozen Fortune | Custom | Custom | Custom |
SalesQL
| Plan | Price | Credits/Month | Seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 | 1 |
| Starter | $39/mo ($29/mo annual) | 2,000 | 1 |
| Advanced | $79/mo ($59/mo annual) | 5,000 | 3 |
| Pro | $119/mo ($89/mo annual) | 12,000 | 15 |
At comparable entry tiers, ReachStream delivers more credits per dollar. But if your workflow is "browse profiles, grab contacts instantly," SalesQL's extension-first experience can still be the better fit.
ReachStream charges only for verified emails. SalesQL doesn't. Prospeo takes it further: 98% email accuracy across 143M+ verified addresses, a 7-day refresh cycle, and you pay ~$0.01 per email. No more running exports through a second verification tool.
Get cleaner data than both tools at a fraction of the cost.
Data Quality & Accuracy
Here's the thing: this is where the comparison gets lopsided.
ReachStream's biggest advantage is data accuracy - it's the most-mentioned pro on G2, with 17 separate reviews calling it out. Credits only get deducted for verified/valid emails, which in our experience makes it more trustworthy than tools that charge you for bounced addresses. If you're evaluating other options, compare against the broader landscape of data enrichment services.
SalesQL's accuracy is inconsistent. One Capterra reviewer described the data as "completely inaccurate," and another said the tool "works 50% of the time." Multiple reviewers explicitly recommend verifying emails with a separate service like NeverBounce before sending anything. If you need a dedicated verifier, see these Bouncer alternatives.
If you're running cold outbound and your bounce rate matters - it always does - SalesQL without a secondary verification tool is a liability. You'll spend the money you saved on credits cleaning up the mess. (For benchmarks and fixes, use this email bounce rate guide.)
What Users Actually Say
ReachStream's G2 profile sits at 4.8/5 across 52 reviews. Users praise data quality and ease of use. The complaints center on CRM integration friction (5 mentions) and occasional missing emails. Real issues, but operational, not dealbreakers. If you're building lists from scratch, it helps to align on sales prospecting techniques first.
SalesQL's reviews split hard by platform. On G2: 4.5/5 from 166 reviews. On Capterra: 3.8/5 from 46 reviews, with customer service scoring just 3.3/5. Multiple reviewers report being charged without permission and hitting a "zero days return and refund policy" wall. That refund policy is a genuine red flag. If you commit to annual billing, you're trusting a company that multiple users say won't return your money.
On Reddit, recruiters describe a workflow of enriching lead lists with SalesQL and exporting to their ATS - cheap and fast, but with formatting quirks like "current company without dates only imports." The extension is also subject to daily profile view limits (200-1,000/day depending on your account tier), and exceeding them can cause temporary restrictions on your browsing.
A Stronger Alternative to Both
You also get 30+ search filters (buyer intent, technographics, job changes, funding signals), a Chrome extension with 40,000+ users, and native integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Smartlead, Instantly, and Clay. Pricing starts around $39/mo with a free tier of 75 verified emails monthly. No contracts, cancel anytime. If you want a deeper breakdown of list-building economics, this Clay list building guide is a solid reference.
SalesQL's extension has daily view limits and inconsistent accuracy. ReachStream lacks frequent data refreshes. Prospeo gives you a 40,000+ user Chrome extension, a 300M+ contact database with 30+ filters, and 125M+ verified mobiles - all refreshed weekly.
Stop choosing between a database and an extension - get both.
FAQ
Is ReachStream or SalesQL better for recruiters?
SalesQL fits recruiters who prospect on professional profiles - its Chrome extension enriches in bulk and maps to ATS imports. ReachStream suits teams that need a standalone database without daily view limits. For recruiters who need both workflows plus verified mobiles, Prospeo's extension and database cover both use cases without forcing you to choose.
Does SalesQL offer refunds?
SalesQL enforces a "zero days return and refund policy." Multiple Capterra reviewers report being unable to recover charges for unused credits. Read their terms carefully before committing to annual billing.
Which tool has the most accurate email data?
ReachStream leads this head-to-head with its verify-before-charge model. SalesQL's accuracy is inconsistent, with Capterra reviewers reporting 50% hit rates. For teams where deliverability is critical, Prospeo's 98% email accuracy across 143M+ verified addresses and 5-step verification process sets a higher bar than either option.