Salesbot vs FindEmails.com (Toofr): Honest Comparison for 2026
If you're weighing Salesbot against FindEmails.com (formerly Toofr), the first thing to understand is that one tool is a full outbound platform and the other is a point solution for email lookups. Comparing them without understanding that distinction wastes your time and budget.
30-Second Verdict
- Pick Salesbot if you need mobile numbers, waterfall enrichment, and built-in outreach sequences in one platform.
- Pick FindEmails.com if you just need a lightweight email finder/verifier with API access and per-credit pricing.
- Skip both if data accuracy and deliverability are the real bottleneck. We've seen too many teams bolt on outreach automation before fixing their data - and it never ends well.
What Each Tool Actually Is
Salesbot is a prospecting and execution platform. It waterfalls across multiple data providers to surface 695M+ contacts, prioritizing verified emails and mobile numbers. You build lists, run drip campaigns, and export to HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach, or Instantly from one dashboard. The vendor claims teams see 4x response rates and 50% more verified contacts versus manual prospecting.
FindEmails.com is the rebranded version of Toofr - same product, same team. G2 reviews still carry "Toofr Review" labels under the FindEmails listing. It's an email finder and verifier with a Chrome extension, a developer-friendly API, and a lead list marketplace. No outreach features. No mobile numbers.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Salesbot | FindEmails.com | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Database size | 695M+ contacts | Undisclosed | Salesbot |
| Email finding | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Email verification | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Mobile/direct dials | Yes | No | Salesbot |
| Chrome extension | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Outreach sequences | Built-in | No | Salesbot |
| API access | Enterprise only | All plans | FindEmails |
| CRM integrations | HubSpot, Salesforce | CSV export + API | Salesbot |
| Lead marketplace | No | Yes | FindEmails |
Salesbot wins on breadth. FindEmails wins on simplicity and developer access. The real question is whether you need the breadth - most solo operators and small dev teams don't.
Salesbot claims 695M+ contacts. FindEmails won't disclose its database size. Prospeo gives you 300M+ profiles verified through a 5-step process - with 98% email accuracy, 125M+ mobile numbers, and a 7-day refresh cycle. Breadth means nothing if half the data bounces.
Stop comparing features and start comparing bounce rates.
Pricing Breakdown
| FindEmails.com | Salesbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry plan | $29/mo (1,000 credits) | $49/mo (1 user) |
| Mid plan | $49/mo (2,500 credits) | $99/mo per user (2+ users) |
| Top plan | $99/mo (10,000 credits) | Custom enterprise |
| Credit system | 1 credit per action | 12K email + 900 mobile credits/yr |
| Free trial | Not available | 7-day, no credit card |
FindEmails' credit system is simple but easy to misread: 1 credit is consumed when you find an email, verify an email, or pull a prospect. If you're primarily running email lookups, the $29/mo plan works out to about $0.029 per credit for up to 1,000 emails returned. Run separate verification jobs or use the Prospect feature heavily, and you'll burn through credits faster than expected.
What Users Actually Say
FindEmails.com carries a 3.7/5 on G2 across 11 reviews. The praise is consistent: time saver, easy to use, gets the job done. The complaints are equally consistent - slow customer support and "wrong combinations" in results. That accuracy complaint matters. FindEmails claims 98% accuracy on its site, but the G2 feedback doesn't read like a product performing at that level for everyone.
Salesbot sits at 4.8/5 on G2 based on just 3 reviews. Users praise the speed - building target lists and launching drip campaigns in 15-20 minutes. The main gripe: CRM integration that was "supposed to be seamless" but wasn't. Here's the thing - with only 3 reviews, it's hard to draw strong conclusions. There also isn't much usable discussion on Reddit or sales forums compared to bigger, more widely adopted data providers.
Best-For Scenarios
You need mobile numbers plus outbound execution. Salesbot. Mobile credits, built-in sequences, and waterfall enrichment across providers - one platform, no stitching tools together.
You need a cheap email finder with API access. FindEmails.com at $29/mo. If you're a developer embedding email lookups into an internal tool, it handles that without platform overhead.
Let's be honest: both Salesbot and FindEmails are fine tools for their niches. But if your bounce rate is above 5%, no amount of outreach automation or cheap credits will save your pipeline. Fix the data first, then pick your workflow tool. Stack Optimize built to $1M ARR using that exact approach - keeping client deliverability above 94% with zero domain flags.
If you're diagnosing why lists bounce in the first place, start with email bounce rate benchmarks and fixes, then work through a proper email deliverability checklist.
FindEmails charges $0.029/credit with no mobile numbers. Salesbot locks API access behind enterprise pricing. Prospeo starts at $0.01/email with full API access, 125M+ verified mobiles at 30% pickup rate, and native integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, Instantly, and more - no enterprise gate.
Better data, lower cost, zero contracts. Test it yourself.
FAQ
Is Toofr the Same as FindEmails.com?
Yes - same product, same team, new name. G2 reviews still carry "Toofr Review" labels under the FindEmails.com listing. If you see old Toofr references in forums or documentation, they point to the same service at findemails.com.
Does FindEmails.com Include Phone Numbers?
No. FindEmails.com is email-only - no direct dials or mobile numbers. Salesbot bundles mobile credits into its plans. For standalone mobile data, Prospeo offers 125M+ verified mobile numbers with a 30% pickup rate, available on all paid plans.
Which Tool Is Better for Agencies?
FindEmails.com works for lightweight, low-volume lookups. Salesbot handles multi-channel outbound with built-in sequences. For agencies scaling across multiple clients, the real risk isn't feature gaps - it's domain damage from bad data. Weekly data refreshes and high verification accuracy matter more than any single feature when you're sending on behalf of clients who trust you with their sender reputation.