Agile Education Marketing vs TAMI AI: Which Data Tool Fits Your Team?
Comparing Agile Education Marketing to TAMI AI is like comparing a scalpel to a Swiss Army knife. One is built for education vendors selling into K-12 districts and the broader education market. The other is a general-purpose B2B sales intelligence platform covering dozens of verticals. We've worked with edtech teams evaluating both, and the answer depends entirely on who you're selling to - not which tool has more features.
The Quick Verdict
Pick Agile Education Marketing if you sell into K-12 and need district-level intelligence: enrollment data, funding context, decision-maker contacts, and strategic plan summaries for 18,600+ U.S. school districts.
Pick TAMI AI if you sell across multiple verticals and need technographic filtering, a credit-based self-serve model, and CRM integrations for general B2B prospecting.
What Each Tool Does
Agile Education Marketing
Agile is an education data and intelligence provider with coverage spanning pre-K through higher ed. Its flagship product, EdIntel.AI District Profiles, delivers searchable profiles for 18,600+ U.S. school districts covering enrollment, demographics, revenue mix, Title I and IEP participation, budgets, and key decision-makers. The profiles also generate AI summaries of district strategic plans across eight market verticals, linking to original source documents. Access to EdIntel.AI district profiles is free - no trial deadlines, no credit card required.
Beyond the database, Agile offers on-demand list building via Prospector, CRM integrations for Salesforce and HubSpot/Marketo, data hygiene services, and omnichannel campaign support. It's a complete marketing partner for education vendors, not just a data provider.
TAMI AI
TAMI is a cloud-based B2B sales intelligence platform for multi-vertical prospecting. The G2 profile lists 17M+ companies and 450M contacts, while a SoftwareFinder overview cites 150M+ companies across 190 countries - different counting methodologies, but either way it's a broad database.
The real differentiator is technographic filtering. You can target companies by website technology, payment providers, shipping partners, ecommerce platforms, and patented merchant detection - genuinely useful when your ICP is defined by tech stack. It integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho, Salesloft, and Close.
TAMI runs on a credit-based model with real-time enrichment and reports a <5% email bounce rate, though G2 reviewers (4.3/5 from 139 reviews) consistently flag outdated contact info. The Browser Companion extension costs $39/mo with a 7-day free trial.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Agile Education | TAMI AI |
|---|---|---|
| Focus market | K-12 / education | Multi-vertical B2B |
| Database scope | 18.6K+ U.S. districts | 17M+ companies globally |
| Data type | District intel + contacts | Contacts + technographics |
| Pricing model | Custom-quoted | Credit-based, self-serve |
| Starting price | Custom (mid-four figures/mo) | $0 (free tier) |
| CRM integrations | Salesforce, HubSpot | SF, HubSpot, Pipedrive+ |
| G2 rating | Not rated | 4.3/5 (139 reviews) |
| Best for | Edtech vendors | General B2B prospecting |
Neither Agile nor TAMI gives you verified emails across every vertical with 98% accuracy. Prospeo's 300M+ profiles, 30+ filters - including technographics, buyer intent, and funding signals - cover education and every other industry without forcing you to pick a lane.
Stop stitching together vertical tools. One platform, every market, $0.01/email.
Pricing Breakdown
TAMI publishes transparent pricing on its pricing page. The Free plan gives you 50 export credits and 5 mobile credits. Basic runs $55/user/mo (drops to $47 on annual billing) and includes 250 export credits plus 40 mobile credits. Growth - their most popular tier - is $79/user/mo or $67 annually, with 500 export credits and 80 mobile credits. Enterprise is custom-quoted with unlimited exports. One catch worth knowing: credits reset monthly and don't roll over.
Agile Education Marketing doesn't publish pricing - the pricing page returns a 404. Expect custom quotes in the mid-to-high four figures per month depending on coverage, seats, and campaign bundles. Here's the thing: in 2026, hiding pricing typically forces a sales conversation before you can evaluate fit, and that's frustrating for any team running a quick comparison.
When to Choose Which
Agile: The Education-Only Play
Imagine your SDR has a call with a Texas school district in 20 minutes. With Agile, they pull up the district's enrollment trends, Title I participation rate, budget breakdown, and an AI summary of the district's strategic plan - all before dialing. No other tool delivers that depth for K-12. In our experience, Agile's district profiles are the single best pre-call research asset in edtech sales, and we've seen reps walk into calls sounding like they've been studying the district for weeks when they prepped for ten minutes.
Skip it entirely if you sell into any other vertical. It won't help you.
TAMI: The Horizontal Prospector
TAMI earns its spot when your ICP spans multiple industries and is defined by technology stack. Targeting companies running Shopify Plus with Stripe payments? TAMI's technographic filters handle that. The self-serve credit model means you start free and scale without a sales conversation. But skip it if data accuracy is your top priority - G2 reviewers consistently flag outdated contacts, and a <5% bounce rate claim doesn't always hold up in practice.
Let's be honest: this comparison shouldn't really exist. These tools serve fundamentally different markets. If you're choosing between them, you probably haven't nailed down whether your go-to-market strategy is vertical-specific or horizontal. Figure that out first.
If Neither Tool Fits Your Team
Beyond raw contact data, Prospeo layers in 30+ search filters - buyer intent powered by Bombora across 15,000 topics, technographics, job changes, headcount growth, and funding signals - so you can build targeted lists regardless of vertical. We've seen teams report 98% email accuracy versus the sub-95% rates common with general-purpose platforms, which directly protects domain reputation during high-volume outbound. One of our customers, Stack Optimize, built from $0 to $1M ARR while keeping client deliverability above 94% and bounce rates under 3% - zero domain flags across all clients.
TAMI's G2 reviewers flag outdated contacts. Agile doesn't publish pricing. Prospeo refreshes data every 7 days - not the 6-week industry average - so your reps never dial dead numbers. Stack Optimize built to $1M ARR with bounce rates under 3% and zero domain flags.
Protect your domain reputation with data that's never more than a week old.
FAQ
Can TAMI AI be used for education prospecting?
Technically yes, but it lacks district-level intelligence - funding context, Title I data, enrollment demographics, AI-summarized strategic plans. You'd prospect education accounts the same way you'd prospect any other vertical, without the sector depth Agile provides.
Does Agile Education Marketing work outside education?
No. Its entire database and service model revolves around K-12 and higher ed. If you sell to other verticals alongside education, you'll need a separate tool for those accounts.
What's a good alternative if neither Agile nor TAMI fits?
Prospeo covers 300M+ profiles across all industries at 98% email accuracy, starting free with 75 emails per month. It's built for teams that need verified contacts without vertical restrictions, annual contracts, or enterprise-level pricing commitments.