Grata vs SourceScrub: The Merger Changes Everything
Datasite acquired SourceScrub in August 2025 and announced it's integrating SourceScrub's data and capabilities into Grata. So if you're evaluating Grata vs SourceScrub side by side, you're really comparing a product with its own future self. That changes the math for every deal team rebuilding their M&A pipeline stack right now.
30-Second Verdict
If you need private company discovery today, Grata's the move. It's absorbing SourceScrub's data, it scores higher on every key G2 usability metric, and it's the platform Datasite is betting on long-term.
If you specifically need conference-based sourcing, check whether SourceScrub's standalone access still exists - new procurement likely routes through Datasite/Grata.
Here's the thing, though: most middle-market deal teams don't have a finding problem. They have a reaching problem. Both tools surface great targets, then hand you contact data that bounces. Fix that first.
What Each Tool Does
Grata is an AI-native private market intelligence platform covering 19M+ private companies. Its NLP-powered search lets dealmakers describe what they're looking for in plain language, and the platform surfaces relevant targets with financials, executive contacts, and deal comps. Backed by 500+ industry specialists who label and train the AI models, it's built for PE, IB, and corp dev teams running end-to-end deal sourcing workflows.
SourceScrub built its reputation on curated, human-enriched data - 16M companies drawn from 220,000+ information sources. The standout feature is conference-based sourcing: 190,000+ curated lists let users filter event exhibitor rosters to find acquisition targets. One practitioner described running a 1,500-exhibitor conference list through SourceScrub and pulling 25-30 qualified targets in about two hours. Per Ramp's vendor data, SourceScrub holds roughly 5% adoption in the deal sourcing category (8% in mid-market) - niche, but deeply embedded where it lands.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Grata | SourceScrub | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| G2 Rating | 4.8/5 (79 reviews) | 4.5/5 (56 reviews) | Grata |
| Ease of Use (G2) | 9.7/10 | 8.5/10 | Grata |
| Database Size | 19M+ companies | 16M companies | Grata |
| Approach | NLP/AI discovery | Curated lists + analysts | Depends on workflow |
| Conference Data | Planned (merger integration) | 190K+ lists | SourceScrub (for now) |
| CRM Integrations | Salesforce (and other CRMs) | Salesforce (and other CRMs) | Tie |
| Starting Price | $15,000/yr (Basic) | ~$10K-$25K+/yr | Depends |
The G2 head-to-head tells a clear story. Grata wins on ease of use, ease of admin (10.0 vs 8.3), quality of support (9.8 vs 9.1), and meets requirements (9.5 vs 8.6). We've tested both interfaces, and Grata's NLP search genuinely feels like a generation ahead of keyword-based filtering. SourceScrub's conference list edge is real but temporary - those capabilities are being folded into Grata.
Deal sourcing platforms like Grata and SourceScrub cost $15K+/year but share the same weakness: contact data that bounces. Prospeo fills that gap with 98% email accuracy, 125M+ verified mobiles, and a 7-day refresh cycle - all starting free.
Stop letting $15K sourcing tools fail at the last mile.
Pricing Reality
Neither tool makes this easy. Grata's Basic plan lists at $15,000/year on Capterra, though higher tiers scale with seats, CRM integrations, and add-on modules. SourceScrub publishes three tiers - Discovery Essentials, Sourcing Plus, and Winning - but every one requires a pricing conversation. Mid-market deal sourcing platforms typically land in the $10K-$25K+ range. One G2 reviewer flagged that SourceScrub "can be pricy for smaller firms" with a steep learning curve.
The Contact Data Problem
The #1 complaint on G2 for both tools is data inaccuracy - 18 mentions for Grata, 13 for SourceScrub. A Searchfunder practitioner put it bluntly: Grata's "projections and contact information not always very accurate." You find the right companies, then can't actually reach the people who run them. That's a frustrating place to be when you're paying $15K+ a year for a sourcing platform.
If you're seeing bounces, start by tracking your email bounce rate and tightening your email deliverability basics before you scale outreach.
A dedicated verification layer fixes this. Prospeo checks emails and phone numbers in real time - 98% email accuracy, 125M+ verified mobiles, refreshed every 7 days. At roughly $0.01 per email with a free starting tier, it's built for exactly this gap. Deal teams spending $15K+ on sourcing platforms shouldn't let $50/month in verification costs be the reason outreach bounces.
If you want to compare options, see our roundup of email verification tools and data enrichment services.
18 G2 reviewers flagged Grata's contact accuracy. 13 flagged SourceScrub's. Prospeo runs real-time verification on every email and phone number - 98% accuracy, refreshed weekly, at roughly $0.01 per email. Your deal pipeline deserves better than bounced outreach.
Verify every contact before you hit send - start with 75 free credits.
Which Should You Pick?
Need private company discovery now? Go with Grata. It's the surviving platform, it has better usability scores, and SourceScrub's data is being folded in. You'll get both datasets eventually.
Need conference-based sourcing specifically? Confirm whether SourceScrub still sells standalone access. Official messaging says capabilities "will be integrated into Grata," but existing contracts are honored through their terms.
For teams that want predictive deal signals instead of database search, tools like DealPotential take a fundamentally different approach - worth exploring if static company databases aren't matching your workflow. If you're building outbound sequences off these lists, pair it with proven sales prospecting techniques and tighter personalized outreach. Skip both Grata and SourceScrub if your deal flow already comes from proprietary networks and you just need a way to verify the contact info you already have.
Let's be honest about what we've seen across dozens of deal teams: the real bottleneck in 2026 isn't company discovery. It's contact data quality. The consensus in PE and IB communities tracks with the G2 reviews - these platforms find targets well, but the last-mile contact accuracy is where deals stall. Solving that piece separately, with a purpose-built verification tool, tends to be the highest-ROI move you can make.
FAQ
Is SourceScrub still available standalone?
Datasite announced in August 2025 that SourceScrub's data and capabilities will be integrated into Grata. No explicit discontinuation date has been published, but the roadmap is clear - SourceScrub is becoming part of Grata. New buyers should contact Datasite or Grata sales directly for current availability.
How much does Grata cost in 2026?
Grata Basic lists at $15,000/year. Higher tiers scale with seat count, CRM integrations, and additional modules - expect $15K-$30K+ depending on configuration. SourceScrub pricing is similarly quote-based, typically $10K-$25K+ per year. Neither offers self-serve purchasing.
What about PitchBook or Crunchbase?
Both cover broader datasets but aren't purpose-built for private company sourcing the way Grata is. PitchBook excels at deal comps and fund data; Crunchbase skews toward venture-backed startups. For lower middle-market buy-side searches, Grata's focus on the 19M private company universe is more relevant than either generalist platform.
How do I fix bounced contacts from deal sourcing tools?
Run target contacts through a dedicated verification layer before outreach. Prospeo offers real-time email and mobile verification with 98% accuracy and a 7-day data refresh cycle - compared to the 6-week industry average. The free tier includes 75 email credits per month, enough to test against your current bounce rates.