Prospeo vs Skrapp: Which Email Finder Actually Delivers?
You exported a list from Skrapp, loaded it into your sequencer, hit send - and half the emails bounced. Credits gone, sender reputation dinged, back to square one. That scenario plays out constantly for teams choosing the wrong email finder, and it's the reason this comparison exists.
Let's cut straight to what matters.
30-Second Verdict
Prospeo wins on accuracy (98% verified emails vs Skrapp's ~42-48% in third-party and practitioner tests), data depth (data points (50+ enrichment data points vs 22), and mobile numbers (125M+ verified - Skrapp doesn't offer mobile numbers at all). Skrapp wins on simplicity and its fair-credit billing on paid plans. For low-volume, email-only lookups on a tight budget, Skrapp's free tier works. For everything else, Prospeo.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Prospeo | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Database size | 300M+ profiles | 150M leads |
| Verified emails | 143M+ | Not disclosed |
| Verified mobiles | 125M+ | None |
| Data points per contact | 50+ | 22 |
| Email accuracy | 98% | ~42-48% (tested) |
| Data refresh | 7 days | Daily |
| Intent data | 15,000 topics | No |
| Search filters | 30+ | Basic |
| Chrome extension | Yes (40K+ users) | Yes |
| Integrations | Salesforce, HubSpot, Smartlead, Instantly, Lemlist, Clay, Zapier, Make | HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, others |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 | 4.5/5 (324 reviews) |

The numbers that matter most: more than double the data points per contact, mobile numbers Skrapp doesn't touch, and intent signals across 15,000 topics via Bombora. Skrapp is simpler. That simplicity costs you depth.
Accuracy - What the Data Shows
Here's the thing: most "accuracy" benchmarks are run by vendors with skin in the game. Anymail Finder, Tomba - they're all competitors. But even in those competitor-run tests, the pattern holds.
An Anymail Finder benchmark tested 5,000 fresh contacts and reported Skrapp at 42.8% verified. A Reddit practitioner test ran 100,000+ records through ZeroBounce validation and found Skrapp at 48% valid, with notably poor performance in healthcare and finance verticals. Triangulate those and you're looking at roughly 42-48% usable emails per batch. Skrapp's own pricing page claims 92% search success and 97%+ verification accuracy, but independent testing tells a different story.
A Tomba benchmark reported Prospeo at 16.9% valid results on 5,000 searches. One reason these benchmarks can mislead is they reward tools that return something more often, even if that "something" is risky for deliverability. Prospeo is conservative - it won't return an email unless it can verify deliverability. A tool that returns 2,000 emails where half bounce isn't "better" than one that returns fewer emails that actually land.
We've seen this coverage-vs-quality confusion trip up teams who optimize for volume, and it always costs them in sender reputation. In our testing, the email finder converts credits to usable contacts at nearly 1:1 because of the 5-step verification process with catch-all handling, spam-trap removal, and honeypot filtering.

You just saw the numbers: ~45% usable emails from Skrapp vs 98% from Prospeo. That's the difference between burning credits on bounces and landing in real inboxes. Prospeo's 5-step verification with catch-all handling and spam-trap removal means every credit converts to a deliverable contact.
Stop paying $0.067 per usable email when $0.01 gets you verified data.
Pricing Breakdown
Skrapp Pricing
| Free | Pro | Enterprise | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $0/mo | $30/mo | $262/mo |
| Credits | 100/mo | 1,000/mo | 50,000/mo |
| Annual discount | - | 25% off | 25% off |
Prospeo Pricing
| Free | Paid | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0/mo | From ~$49/mo |
| Credits | 75 emails + 100 ext. | 2,000+ |
| Annual discount | - | Available |
Now the math that actually matters. At 1,000 credits, Skrapp at $30/mo with ~45% validity gives you roughly 450 usable emails - about $0.067 per deliverable contact. Prospeo at ~$0.01/email with 98% accuracy means nearly every credit produces a usable result, landing around $0.010 per usable email. That's roughly 6-7x more per working contact with Skrapp.
One critical caveat: Skrapp's fair-credit policy - where you aren't charged for invalid or unknown results - only applies to paid accounts. Free plan users get charged for all results regardless of verification status. Prospeo only deducts credits for verified emails and found mobile numbers on every tier, including free. No credits wasted on bad data, period. Skrapp does let unused credits roll over, and you keep your credits even if you cancel - a nice touch for intermittent users.
Where Skrapp Falls Short
No mobile or direct-dial numbers. Prospeo has 125M+ verified mobiles with a 30% pickup rate. If you're running multi-channel sequences - email plus cold call - Skrapp simply can't support that workflow. (If you're building a calling stack, see our guide to a cold calling system.)
No intent data. There's no way to filter for in-market buyers before spending credits. Prospeo tracks 15,000 topics via Bombora so you can prioritize accounts showing active buying signals, which changes how you allocate outreach time entirely.
Shallow enrichment. Twenty-two data points per export vs 50+ is the difference between a name-and-email row and a full prospect profile with technographics, funding data, and department headcount. If your sequencer personalizes on anything beyond first name and company, you'll feel this gap immediately.
Basic search filters vs 30+ options including buyer intent, technographics, job change, headcount growth, funding, and revenue. And Skrapp doesn't auto-convert certain exported professional-profile URLs into standard URLs - a small friction that compounds at scale when you're processing thousands of records.
G2 reviews echo these gaps. The recurring complaints: "limited credits," "missing information," and "inaccurate data."

Who Should Pick Which
Use Skrapp if you're a solo operator doing low-volume email lookups on a tight budget and you only need email addresses. The free plan gives you 100 credits a month, the UI is dead simple, and if that's genuinely all you need, it works. Skip Prospeo in that case - you'd be paying for capabilities you won't use.
Use Prospeo if you need accuracy at scale, mobile numbers for multi-channel sequences, enrichment depth beyond name-and-email, intent data to prioritize outreach, or API-driven workflows. Stack Optimize, an outbound agency, built from $0 to $1M ARR on Prospeo data - client deliverability stayed above 94%, bounce rates under 3%, zero domain flags across all clients. That's what reliable data looks like when it compounds over months of outbound. (If deliverability is a priority, pair this with an email deliverability guide and keep an eye on your email bounce rate.)
For most teams doing serious outbound, this isn't a close call. When you weigh accuracy, enrichment depth, and cost per usable contact, the gap between these two tools is wide enough that the "cheaper" option ends up being the expensive one.

Skrapp gives you 22 data points and zero mobile numbers. Prospeo returns 50+ data points per contact, 125M+ verified mobiles with a 30% pickup rate, and intent signals across 15,000 topics. Stack Optimize built a $1M agency on this data with bounce rates under 3%.
Get the emails, mobiles, and intent data Skrapp can't give you.
FAQ
Which tool has better email accuracy?
Third-party and practitioner benchmarks consistently put Skrapp around 42-48% valid emails per batch. Prospeo delivers 98% verified accuracy using a proprietary 5-step verification process - roughly double the usable contacts per credit spent. That gap compounds fast at scale, especially once you factor in the sender reputation damage from high bounce rates.
Does Skrapp find phone numbers?
No. Skrapp focuses exclusively on email finding and doesn't offer mobile or direct-dial numbers. Prospeo provides 125M+ verified mobile numbers globally with a 30% pickup rate, making it the stronger choice for multi-channel outreach sequences that combine email with cold calling.
Is Skrapp's fair-credit policy really free?
On paid plans, yes - you aren't charged for invalid or unknown results. On the free plan, Skrapp charges for all results regardless of verification status. Prospeo only deducts credits for verified results on every tier, including free, so no credits are wasted on bad data regardless of which plan you're on.