80Legs vs Mozenda: Which Web Scraper Still Works in 2026?
You found an old blog post - maybe from 2018 - recommending 80Legs or Mozenda for your next scraping project. Both tools looked solid back then. The problem: 94% of modern websites now rely on client-side rendering, anti-bot deployments are growing 78% year over year, and neither tool was built for that reality.
Here's the thing: comparing these two in 2026 feels a bit like debating Blackberry vs Palm Pilot. But if you're still evaluating them, we've done the homework so you don't have to.
30-Second Verdict
Use Mozenda if you need a visual, no-code scraper and you're on Windows. Use 80Legs if you want cheap, API-driven cloud crawling and don't mind writing JavaScript crawling apps. Skip both if your actual goal is B2B contact data for sales outreach - purpose-built data platforms get you there without touching a crawler.
Feature Comparison
| Criteria | 80Legs | Mozenda |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Cloud crawling via REST API | Visual agent scraper (Agent Builder + Web Console) |
| Pricing | Free, $29/mo, $99/mo, $299/mo; Enterprise custom | ~$99/mo+ (quote required) |
| Free tier/trial | Yes - 10,000 URLs per crawl, unlimited crawls/month, 1 crawl at a time | 14-day free trial + 30-day money-back guarantee |
| Platform | Web-based, API-driven | Windows Agent Builder + web console |
| Coding needed | Yes (JavaScript) | No (point-and-click) |
| Exports | JSON, CSV | TSV, CSV, XML, XLSX, JSON |
| JS rendering | Limited | Limited |
| Status in 2026 | G2 profile inactive 1+ year | Active, but pricing hidden behind demo form |
80Legs offers transparent tiered pricing from Free up to $299/mo for Premium, with an Enterprise custom tier. Mozenda's pricing page is a lead form. Software Advice lists a $99/mo starting point, but the actual quote depends on number of sites, number of records, and crawl frequency.
Mozenda's Agent Builder only runs on Windows. In our experience, that's a dealbreaker for most modern teams - you'll need a Windows machine or a VM just to create scraping agents. Mozenda does offer a Job Sequencer and Request Blocking for faster scraping, but those features don't help with the JavaScript rendering gap that defines the modern web. 80Legs is API-first: more flexible for developers, a non-starter for marketing ops folks who just want data in a spreadsheet.
Building scrapers to find business emails is solving the wrong problem. Prospeo gives you 300M+ profiles with 98% email accuracy and 125M+ verified mobiles - refreshed every 7 days, not whenever your crawler finishes. No proxies, no parsing, no agents getting stuck in loops.
Get verified contacts in seconds, not hours of crawling.
What Users Actually Say
Both tools carry a 4.4/5 rating - 80Legs on G2 with 30 reviews, Mozenda on Software Advice with 29 reviews.
Mozenda praise: Support is responsive and knowledgeable. The API covers everything the UI does, which is genuinely useful for automation workflows.
Mozenda complaints: The tool captures data in flat lists, so nested structures require messy duplication and cleanup. Ease of Use scores just 3.9/5 - low for a "no-code" tool. One reviewer describes agents getting stuck in loops and burning through credits without stopping, calling the sales team's handling of it "unethical."
80Legs: The G2 profile hasn't been active for over a year. That silence tells you more than any review could.
Both Tools Are Legacy at This Point
80Legs is actively cross-promoting Datafiniti, its structured dataset product. The crawling platform still exists, but the strategic direction is clear: they'd rather sell you pre-crawled, cleaned datasets than have you wait for DIY crawls to finish.
Mozenda has been scraping "billions of web pages since 2007," but hiding pricing behind a demo form in 2026 - when most modern competitors publish transparent tiers - signals a company leaning on scoped contracts rather than self-serve growth. In web scraping discussions on Reddit, both tools are increasingly treated as relics, with most conversations centering on Scrapy, Apify, and browser-based solutions instead.
Let's be honest: if you're weighing 80Legs vs Mozenda today, the answer is probably neither. Pick a modern tool built for today's JavaScript-heavy, anti-bot-protected web - or skip scraping entirely if what you actually need is structured data.
Better Alternatives for 2026
The web scraping market is worth over $1 billion and growing fast. Modern tools have left both legacy crawlers behind.
For B2B Contact Data (Skip the Scraper Entirely)
If you're scraping the web to find business emails and phone numbers, you're solving the wrong problem. We've watched teams spend weeks building scraping pipelines only to end up with bounced emails and disconnected numbers. Prospeo covers 300M+ professional profiles with 98% email accuracy and 125M+ verified mobile numbers, refreshed every 7 days - not whenever your crawler finishes. The free tier gives you 75 emails/month, and paid plans run about $0.01 per email. No proxy management, no parsing HTML, just verified contacts ready for outreach.
For General Web Scraping
Octoparse handles what Mozenda can't - visual workflow builder with cloud execution and JavaScript rendering, starting around $89/mo. It's the closest modern equivalent to Mozenda's point-and-click approach, but it actually works on Mac and Linux.
Apify is the developer's pick. Pre-built scraper marketplace, serverless execution, solid JS rendering. Plans start at $39/mo and scale with usage. If Octoparse is for marketers, Apify is for engineers who want to move fast without managing infrastructure.
Got Python skills? Scrapy is free, open-source, and infinitely customizable - but you're managing infrastructure, proxies, and maintenance yourself. ParseHub is another no-code option with a free tier and support for JavaScript/AJAX-heavy pages. Skip ParseHub if you need enterprise-scale volume, though; it's better suited for smaller projects.
Teams using legacy scrapers like 80Legs and Mozenda spend weeks building pipelines that produce bounced emails and disconnected numbers. Prospeo delivers verified B2B data at $0.01/email with a 30% mobile pickup rate - zero infrastructure to manage.
Replace your entire scraping stack with one search.
FAQ
Is 80Legs still active in 2026?
The website is live, but its G2 profile has been inactive for over a year and the company heavily promotes Datafiniti for structured datasets instead. The crawling platform exists as a legacy product - don't build a new workflow around it without thorough testing first.
Does Mozenda work on Mac?
No. Mozenda's Agent Builder requires Windows. The web console is browser-based for monitoring jobs, but creating scraping agents needs a Windows machine or VM - a significant limitation for Mac and Linux teams.
What's the best tool for scraping B2B contact data?
General-purpose scrapers are the wrong tool for this job. Purpose-built B2B data platforms give you verified emails and phone numbers from hundreds of millions of profiles without crawling, proxies, or parsing. You get results in seconds instead of hours.
Are there modern alternatives to both tools?
Yes. For general scraping, Octoparse ($89/mo) and Apify ($39/mo) both handle JavaScript rendering that 80Legs and Mozenda struggle with. For open-source flexibility, Scrapy remains the gold standard. For B2B data specifically, dedicated platforms eliminate the need to scrape at all.
