Clodura.AI vs SalesQL: Which Tool Wins in 2026?

Clodura.AI vs SalesQL: Which Tool Wins in 2026?

SalesQL is a Chrome extension that pulls emails and phones from professional profiles - fast, cheap, focused. Clodura.AI is a full GTM platform with sequences, a dialer, intent data, and a 600M+ contact database. Both score 4.5/5 on G2, but they solve fundamentally different problems. Here's which one deserves your budget.

30-Second Verdict

Pick SalesQL if you're a recruiter or solo SDR who needs fast email and phone enrichment from professional profiles. Simpler, cheaper, extension-first.

Pick Clodura.AI if you're a sales team that wants prospecting, sequences, calling, and intent data in one platform - and you're willing to pay more for that breadth.

Skip both if email accuracy and deliverability are your top priority. Prospeo delivers 98% verified email accuracy on a 7-day data refresh cycle, with transparent pricing starting free.

Feature Comparison

SalesQL wins 2 rows, Clodura.AI wins 4, and 1 is a tie. The pattern is clear: SalesQL is an enrichment tool with a database bolted on, while Clodura.AI is trying to be your entire outbound stack. If you already run Outreach or Salesloft for sequences, Clodura.AI's built-in cadences become expensive overlap. If you don't have a sequencer yet, they're a real differentiator. (If you're comparing more options, see our roundup of SDR tools.)

Pricing Breakdown

Here's the thing about Clodura.AI's credit math: it'll make your head hurt.

SalesQL tiers: Free (100 credits) -> Basic $39/mo (2,000) -> Professional $79/mo (5,000) -> Organization $119/mo (12,000). One credit always equals one full profile with email and phone. Clean and simple.

Clodura.AI charges 1 credit per email and 10 credits per phone number, which means 11 credits for a single complete lead. Their 5,000-credit plan at $100/mo gets you roughly 455 complete leads - not 5,000. We ran the math twice because the pricing page doesn't spell this out; you have to dig into their knowledge base to understand what you're actually buying.

That's an 11x difference in cost-per-lead. Credit-based pricing always looks cheaper than it is, but this gap is unusually wide. If your deal sizes are under $15k and you're running lean outbound, you don't need Clodura.AI's platform overhead. SalesQL's simpler math wins on cost-per-lead every time. (For more vendors in this category, compare data enrichment services.)

Data Quality & Accuracy

Neither tool publishes a platform-wide accuracy percentage. That's a red flag for any team running serious outbound volume. SalesQL describes format checks, server validation, and deliverability scoring - their verifier page shows a 92% example score, but that's a single data point, not a benchmark for the whole database. Clodura.AI promotes a "50+ waterfall email finder & verifier" without publishing accuracy stats either. (If deliverability is the priority, start with an email deliverability guide and a dedicated email reputation tools stack.)

On G2, 81% of SalesQL reviews are 5-star, with ease of use as the top theme, though reviewers flag occasionally outdated data. One recruiter on r/recruiting described SalesQL as cheap and effective for profile-based enrichment, and in a small comparison test preferred it over Seamless and SignalHire. But without published accuracy benchmarks from either tool, you're essentially guessing at deliverability - and guessing burns domains. (If you're seeing bounces, use these email bounce rate benchmarks to diagnose the issue.)

Right Tool for Your Workflow

The classic recruiter workflow on r/recruiting goes like this: Sales Navigator -> SalesQL enrichment -> CSV export -> ATS import. It's fast, it's $0-119/mo depending on plan, and it doesn't try to be more than it is. SalesQL is the pick for recruiters and sourcers running a simple pipeline. Skip it if you need sequences or calling. (If you want to level up outreach, use proven sales prospecting techniques.)

Clodura.AI is the pick for sales teams building outbound from scratch who want one vendor for data, sequences, dialing, and intent. The feature breadth is real - we've seen teams consolidate three tools into Clodura.AI and save on total vendor cost even with the higher per-lead math. But skip it if you already have a sequencer. You'll pay for overlap, and the credit structure makes per-lead costs steeper than they first appear. (If you're building a broader stack, start with outbound lead generation tools.)

Beyond Both: When Accuracy Is the Priority

Look, if you've been burned by bad enrichment data - bounced emails tanking your domain reputation, phone numbers that ring dead - accuracy matters more than feature count. In our experience, the teams that struggle most aren't the ones with too few features. They're the ones sending to unverified lists.

Prospeo covers 300M+ profiles with 143M+ verified emails and 125M+ verified mobiles, all refreshed on a 7-day cycle compared to the six-week industry average. Email accuracy sits at 98%, backed by a proprietary 5-step verification process with catch-all handling, spam-trap removal, and honeypot filtering. No contracts, no sales calls. The free tier gives you 75 emails and 100 extension credits every month, recurring. Paid plans start at ~$39/mo. Pair it with your existing sequencer and you've got a clean data layer without the feature bloat. (If you're evaluating more databases, see best sales prospecting databases.)

FAQ

Is SalesQL better for recruiting or sales?

SalesQL skews heavily toward recruiting. Its extension-first workflow fits sourcing pipelines - enrich a profile, export to CSV, import to your ATS. Sales teams that need sequences, calling, or intent data should look at Clodura.AI or a dedicated outbound stack instead.

Does Clodura.AI have a free plan?

Clodura.AI offers 100 one-time free credits to start, and G2 lists the entry plan as "Free Forever" with 100 email credits/month and credit rollover up to 2 months. SalesQL's free tier is also 100 credits. Prospeo's free plan gives 75 emails plus 100 extension credits monthly, recurring with no expiration.

Which tool has better data accuracy?

Neither publishes a platform-wide accuracy rate. SalesQL shows a 92% example deliverability score on its verifier page, but that's a single data point, not a database-wide benchmark. If verified accuracy is your top priority, Prospeo's 98% email accuracy rate on a 7-day refresh cycle is the benchmark in this category.

How do credits work in Clodura.AI vs SalesQL?

SalesQL uses a 1-credit-per-lead model - one credit reveals a full profile with email and phone. Clodura.AI charges 1 credit for an email and 10 credits for a phone number, meaning a complete lead costs 11 credits. On a 5,000-credit plan, that's roughly 455 full leads from Clodura.AI versus 5,000 from SalesQL.