Lusha vs Revli: Different Tools for Different Jobs
The Lusha vs Revli comparison is misleading from the start - these aren't competitors. Lusha is a general-purpose B2B contact database. Revli is a niche funded-startup intelligence tool. They sit in fundamentally different categories, but the confusion keeps surfacing in Reddit threads, so let's clear it up.
30-Second Verdict
Lusha gives you emails and phone numbers for millions of B2B contacts across industries. Revli gives you weekly lists of recently funded startups and active investors.

- Need contact data for outbound across verticals? → Lusha
- Need a feed of freshly funded startups to target? → Revli
What Is Lusha?
Lusha is a credit-based B2B contact database with a Chrome extension and direct integrations with HubSpot and Salesforce. The credit math matters: revealing an email costs 1 credit, but revealing a phone number costs 10. On the free tier's 70 credits/month, that's either 70 emails or 7 phone numbers or some mix - and you'll run out fast if you need both email and phone for every lead.
Use this if: You're an SDR team that needs quick contact lookups across industries and your outreach is primarily email-first (see sales prospecting techniques).
Skip this if: You rely heavily on phone numbers (the credit burn is brutal), you've hit the wall where Lusha can't find the email or phone - a complaint that surfaces repeatedly on Reddit - or you've run into HubSpot integration issues where deal ownership gets overridden during contact merges.
What Is Revli?
Revli is an invite-only platform that delivers weekly updated lists of recently funded startups and active investors. Founded in 2021, headquartered in Toronto, with one employee listed on LinkedIn - this is an early-stage product. It has no meaningful public review footprint on G2 and sits at 0 reviews on Capterra. The master database runs 55k+ leads. In a recent week, Revli tracked 243 startups raising $2.5B, with 52% of rounds under $5M and 55% of those companies under 25 employees.

One agency owner on r/agency described using Revli as one layer in a multi-source funding-signal workflow alongside Crunchbase and Dealroom. That's the right way to think about it - a signal source, not a general prospecting database.
Here's the thing: the real challenge with funding-signal tools isn't finding the companies. It's enriching those companies with accurate contact data fast enough to act on the signal before your competitors do (i.e., lead enrichment).
If your ICP is defined by funding stage, Revli is worth a look. If your ICP is defined by job title, industry, or company size, you don't need a funding-signal tool at all - you need a contact database (start with an ideal customer profile).

Funding signals are only valuable if you can enrich them with accurate contact data before competitors do. Prospeo's 300M+ profiles refresh every 7 days - not weeks - so you reach decision-makers while the ink on their funding round is still wet. 98% email accuracy, 125M+ verified mobiles, ~$0.01/email.
Stop burning credits on stale data. Start connecting with real buyers.
Key Differences at a Glance
| Lusha | Revli | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | B2B contact database | Funded-startup intel |
| Database size | Large, general-purpose B2B contact coverage | 55k+ leads |
| Pricing model | Per-user credits | Flat monthly rate |
| Starting price | Free plan: $0 (up to 70 credits/mo) | $0 trial (10 funded startups) |
| Integrations | HubSpot, Salesforce, API | CSV export and API access (by plan) |
| Data freshness | Ongoing enrichment | Weekly updates |
| User reviews | Many reviews on G2 | Limited public reviews |
| Best for | General B2B outbound | Funded startup targeting |
Most buyers weighing these two actually need a general B2B data platform, not a funding-signal tool. Lusha is built for reps who need to find anyone's work email or direct dial. Revli is built for a narrow use case: identifying companies that just raised money and reaching their founders first.
If you're running broad outbound, Revli won't help. If you're chasing post-funding windows, Lusha's general database won't give you timing signals (this is where tracking sales triggers matters).
Pricing Breakdown
| Plan | Lusha | Revli (Sales/Agency) |
|---|---|---|
| Free/Trial | $0, 70 credits/mo | $0, 10 funded startups |
| Tier 1 | Pro: ~$29.90/user/mo (annual), 250 credits | Growth: $69/mo (annual) |
| Tier 2 | Premium: ~$52.45/user/mo (annual), 800 credits | Pro: $124/mo (annual) |
| Tier 3 | Scale: custom pricing | All Access: $140/mo (annual) |
| Investor plan | - | $55/mo (annual), $79/mo monthly |

We've watched dozens of teams blow through Lusha credits faster than they expect. Pro's 250 credits/user/month sounds generous until you reveal both emails and phones - that's 11 credits per contact, giving you roughly 22 fully enriched contacts with a few credits left over. At $29.90/user/month, you're paying about $1.32 per fully enriched contact. On monthly plans, unused credits roll over up to 2x your limit; annual plans front-load credits but reset at cycle end, so use them or lose them.
Revli's flat-rate model is simpler but serves a completely different purpose. You're paying for access to a curated database of funded startups, not per-contact reveals.
Better Option for Most Teams
If you came to this comparison looking for reliable B2B contact data, neither Lusha nor Revli is the best answer. Prospeo covers 300M+ professional profiles with 98% email accuracy, includes 143M+ verified emails and 125M+ verified mobile numbers, and refreshes records on a 7-day cycle. Self-serve, no contracts, and pricing starts at ~$0.01/email with a free tier of 75 emails/month plus 100 Chrome extension credits/month - no credit arithmetic required.
If you're also comparing vendors in this category, start with data enrichment services and a broader list of outbound lead generation tools.


Lusha charges 11 credits to fully enrich one contact. Prospeo gives you verified emails at ~$0.01 each and 125M+ direct dials with a 30% pickup rate - no per-user seats, no credit arithmetic. Teams using Prospeo book 26% more meetings than ZoomInfo users and 35% more than Apollo.
Get 75 free emails and 100 Chrome extension credits - no credit card required.

FAQ
Are Lusha and Revli competitors?
No. Revli tracks recently funded startups and active investors with weekly curated lists. Lusha is a general B2B contact database for emails and phone numbers across industries. You'd sooner compare Revli to Crunchbase than to Lusha.
Which tool has better data accuracy?
Revli has no third-party accuracy benchmarks - it's too early-stage for independent testing. Lusha users report accuracy declines over time, particularly for phone numbers, where industry-wide accuracy ranges from 63% to 91%. For teams prioritizing verified data, Prospeo's 98% email accuracy and 7-day refresh cycle outperform both.
