QuickEnrich vs Wiza: 2026 Pricing & Data Comparison

QuickEnrich vs Wiza: 2026 Comparison + Better Pick

Your SDR exports 500 contacts with phone numbers from Wiza's $99/mo Email plan and the invoice comes back $43.75 higher than expected - just in phone charges. QuickEnrich bundles mobiles for free but barely has a review footprint. Neither choice feels clean, and that's exactly why this QuickEnrich vs Wiza comparison exists.

30-Second Verdict

QuickEnrich wins on cost. Free mobile numbers, double-verified emails, and a $29/mo starting price make it the budget play for bulk enrichment - especially through Clay.

Wiza wins on workflow. The Chrome extension and prospecting from professional profiles are genuinely smooth. If your reps live in the browser, Wiza's UX is hard to beat.

Feature Comparison at a Glance

Pricing Breakdown

We ran the numbers on what 500 contacts per month actually costs - including phone numbers, because that's where Wiza's pricing surprises teams.

QuickEnrich's Starter plan runs $29/mo for 3,000 found emails. Mobile numbers come free when available, and you can expect roughly 25% of contacts to include a mobile, so about 125 phones from 500 contacts. The Growth plan bumps to $99/mo for 11,000 found emails, and annual billing drops those to $24/mo and $83/mo respectively.

Wiza's pricing is more layered. The Starter tier at $49/mo gives you 100 emails and 100 phones. The Email plan at $99/mo provides 500 emails but charges $0.35 per phone number and $0.15 per extra email overage - need those 125 mobiles? That's an extra ~$43.75. The Email + Phone plan at $199/mo bundles 500 emails and 500 phone numbers, but you're paying nearly 7x what QuickEnrich charges for the same volume. Annual "unlimited" plans at $83/mo and $166/mo sound appealing until you hit the 30,000 exports/year cap. That's 2,500/month. Not truly unlimited.

The gap is stark. For teams doing bulk enrichment where cost-per-contact matters, QuickEnrich is 5-7x cheaper.

If you're still evaluating providers, it helps to benchmark against the broader category of data enrichment services and the best sales prospecting databases before you commit.

Data Quality & Verification

Here's the thing: cheap data that bounces is more expensive than pricey data that lands. B2B contact data decays roughly 30% per year, so verification methodology matters more than database size.

QuickEnrich runs double verification - SMTP checks plus catchall detection - and stamps each email with a verification date. That timestamp transparency is a detail most providers skip. It's genuinely useful when you're deciding whether to re-verify a list before launching a campaign.

Wiza's ease of use is its strongest suit, with 427 G2 reviewers citing it. But accuracy complaints tell a different story. Across 1,143 G2 reviews, 57 mention inaccurate data and 65 flag limited contacts or low success rates. The most-cited negatives? Expensive (157 mentions) and limited credits (127 mentions).

In our experience testing enrichment tools across client campaigns, the pattern is consistent: the tools that look cheapest on paper often cost the most in bounced emails and burned sending domains. Keep bounces under 2% to protect your domain reputation - that's non-negotiable regardless of which provider you choose. (If you want a deeper breakdown, see our guide to email bounce rate and the full email deliverability guide.)

Use QuickEnrich if you're running waterfall enrichment through Clay and need verified emails with date stamps at low cost. It's newer and doesn't have the review volume Wiza does, so you're trusting vendor claims until the review footprint builds.

Use Wiza if your reps prospect directly from the Chrome extension and value the browser-native workflow. Skip it if you're cost-sensitive on phone numbers or doing high-volume enrichment where overages compound fast.

Let's be honest: if your deals average under five figures, Wiza's per-phone charges will eat your margins before the data pays for itself. Go cheaper or go more accurate. The middle ground is the worst place to be.

What If Neither Tool Fits?

Both tools have real gaps. QuickEnrich lists 130M+ contacts, and Wiza's accuracy complaints are hard to ignore despite the 850M headline number.

If you're building a repeatable outbound motion, it can also help to align your tooling with proven sales prospecting techniques and a clean lead generation workflow so enrichment doesn't become the bottleneck.

Who Should Pick What

Pick QuickEnrich if you're a budget-conscious team doing bulk enrichment via Clay and you don't need a massive database - just clean, cheap emails with free mobiles attached. (If you're comparing more options, our roundup of SDR tools is a good next stop.)

Pick Wiza for teams whose reps live in the Chrome extension, prospect natively from professional profiles, and can absorb the higher per-contact cost for a smoother workflow.

Pick Prospeo if accuracy, data freshness, and mobile coverage at scale are non-negotiable - and you'd rather not pay $0.35 per phone number or wonder when your emails were last verified.

FAQ

Does QuickEnrich have a free tier?

QuickEnrich doesn't advertise a permanent free plan on its pricing page. Wiza offers 20 free emails per month. The most generous free option among the three is Prospeo at 75 free emails plus 100 Chrome extension credits monthly - no contract or credit card required.

Is Wiza accurate enough for cold outreach?

Wiza advertises 99%+ deliverability, but G2 reviewers flag inaccurate data (57 mentions) and low success rates (65 mentions). We'd recommend verifying a sample batch of 50-100 contacts before scaling any provider into live sequences. Keep bounces under 2% to protect your sending domain.

Can I use QuickEnrich or Wiza with Clay?

QuickEnrich integrates with Clay via HTTP API - a GET request with your API key. Wiza lacks a native Clay connector. Prospeo offers a native Clay integration plus Zapier and Make support, making it the simplest option for an existing enrichment waterfall.