ReachFast vs Wiza: An Honest Comparison for 2026
Your team exported 500 contacts last week and 80 bounced. That's not just wasted credits - it's domain reputation damage you'll spend weeks recovering from. If you're weighing ReachFast against Wiza, the decision comes down to how you prospect and what you're willing to pay for bad data.
We've tested both tools against real ICP lists, and the differences are sharper than either vendor's marketing page suggests.
30-Second Verdict
ReachFast wins if you're a recruiting or staffing agency that needs verified mobile numbers and a pay-for-valid guarantee. You never pay for bad data.
Wiza wins if you live in Sales Navigator and need high-volume exports with tight CRM integrations.
Feature Comparison at a Glance
| Feature | ReachFast | Wiza | Prospeo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Database | 385M+ profiles | 850M+ (claimed) | 300M+ verified |
| Email accuracy | 97%+ | Up to 99% (claimed) | 98% |
| Phone accuracy | 92%+ direct dial | Not specified | 125M+ mobiles |
| Pricing model | Pay-for-valid | Credit on export | Credit-based |
| Credit refund | Yes, instant | No | Pay only if found |
| Intent data | No | No | Yes (15K topics) |
| Data refresh | Not stated | Not stated | 7 days |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA, DSGVO | Not specified | GDPR compliant |
| Key integrations | Clay, API, CSV/Excel | HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach, Pipedrive, Zapier, Clay | Salesforce, HubSpot, Smartlead, Instantly, Lemlist, Salesloft, Outreach, Clay, Zapier, Make, n8n |
Wiza's database looks bigger on paper, but raw profile count means nothing if a chunk of those emails bounce. ReachFast's smaller database ships with a verification guarantee Wiza doesn't match.
Pricing Breakdown
ReachFast starts at $39.99/mo for 1,000 credits, scaling to $99.99/mo for 3,000 credits, $259.99/mo for 9,000 credits, and $1,199.99/mo for enterprise. One email costs 1 credit; one mobile costs 10. Invalid contacts get refunded instantly.
Wiza offers a free tier (20 emails, 5 phones), then $49/mo for 100 emails + 100 phones. The Email plan runs $99/mo monthly or $83/mo billed annually, and Email + Phone is $199/mo monthly or $166/mo annually. There's also a Team plan at $449/mo billed annually.
Let's break down the math that actually matters:
- On Wiza's $199/mo Email + Phone plan, you get 500 emails + 500 phones/month - roughly $0.40 per phone before factoring in waste from invalid exports.
- On ReachFast's $39.99/mo plan, you get 1,000 email credits at about $0.04 per email, with phones at 10 credits each (so $0.40 per phone) - and bad data gets refunded.
ReachFast refunds bad credits. Wiza doesn't. Prospeo skips the problem entirely - 98% email accuracy with a 7-day data refresh cycle means you're not paying for stale contacts or fighting bounce rates. At ~$0.01/email, you spend 90% less than legacy tools.
Stop debating credit refunds and start with data that doesn't bounce.
The Credit Model Problem
Here's the thing: Wiza charges credits on every export attempt regardless of whether the email is valid. G2 reviewer Vivek R. put it bluntly - credits are consumed even when verification fails. When you're exporting thousands of contacts monthly and 15-20% bounce, that's hundreds of credits burned on contacts that never reach an inbox.
If you're trying to keep deliverability stable, you need to treat bounce rate as a core metric, not an afterthought (see email bounce rate benchmarks and fixes).
On r/sales, a 4-person team called Wiza "way too expensive since we do high volume prospecting" and started hunting for alternatives. We've seen this pattern play out repeatedly with credit-on-export models, and it's genuinely frustrating to watch teams hemorrhage budget on phantom contacts.
It gets worse. Wiza caps exports at 2,500 contacts per Sales Navigator export and 1,000 per LinkedIn Recruiter export. LATAM coverage is a known gap. Once bounce rates climb above 5%, email service providers start flagging your domain - and that damage compounds fast. ReachFast's instant credit refunds eliminate this risk entirely.
What Users Actually Say
Wiza has volume on its side: 1,143 G2 reviews at 4.5/5. Top praise centers on ease of use (427 mentions), contact information quality (322), and LinkedIn integration (192). The cons tell a different story - expensive (157 mentions), limited credits (127), inaccurate data (57). Billing and cancellation friction, including unexpected charges, also comes up repeatedly.
If you're building a repeatable outbound motion, it's worth pressure-testing your stack against modern sales prospecting techniques before you commit to a single data source.
ReachFast has far fewer reviews: 12 on G2 and 15 on Trustpilot, both at 4.5/5. But they're consistently positive on accuracy. One Trustpilot reviewer, a co-founder at Tophire, reported "10X ROI on our investment." Another called it "superior to other tools in the market, such as ContactOut, SalesQL."
Twelve reviews vs 1,143 is a meaningful gap. Wiza's track record is more battle-tested. But ReachFast's accuracy feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with almost no negative comments in the small sample.
Who Should Pick Which
Staffing and recruiting agencies - ReachFast. The mobile-first approach, pay-for-valid model, and agency-specific positioning make it purpose-built for your workflow. If you're doing staffing outreach, pair your data source with proven cold email templates for staffing agencies to protect reply rates.
High-volume Sales Navigator users - Wiza. The export pipeline, CRM integrations, and Chrome extension create a tight prospecting loop, as long as you can stomach the credit waste and export caps.
Teams needing accuracy + intent + scale - neither. Run a 2-week parallel test with your actual ICP list, but also look at the option below.
One strong opinion from our team: if your bounce rate is already above 5%, neither tool's accuracy claims matter until you fix your data hygiene. The cheapest tool is the one that doesn't wreck your domain.
A Third Option Worth Testing
The 7-day data refresh cycle means you're not emailing someone who changed jobs six weeks ago. And the free tier - 75 verified emails plus 100 Chrome extension credits monthly, no credit card - lets you test before committing a dollar. In our experience, teams that run a side-by-side test against their existing provider rarely go back. If you're comparing more vendors, start with a broader list of data enrichment services to benchmark accuracy and pricing.
Both ReachFast and Wiza lack intent data and publish no data refresh schedule. Prospeo refreshes every 7 days, tracks 15,000 buyer intent topics, and gives you 125M+ verified mobiles with a 30% pickup rate - all on a free tier with 75 emails and 100 Chrome extension credits.
Run a side-by-side test - most teams never switch back.
FAQ
Is ReachFast accurate enough for high-volume outreach?
ReachFast delivers 97%+ email and 92%+ direct dial accuracy with instant credit refunds for invalid contacts. Review volume is small (12 G2 reviews) but consistently positive, and the pay-for-valid model means bad data never costs you. For teams sending over 5,000 emails monthly, run a parallel test before fully committing.
Does Wiza charge credits for invalid emails?
Yes. Wiza consumes credits on every export regardless of validity. Multiple G2 reviewers confirm credits are lost when verification fails, inflating your effective cost per contact - especially painful at scale where 15-20% bounce rates can burn hundreds of credits monthly.
Is there a free alternative to both tools?
Prospeo offers a permanent free tier with 75 verified emails and 100 Chrome extension credits per month, no credit card required. It delivers 98% email accuracy with access to 125M+ verified mobiles, making it a strong starting point before committing to either ReachFast or Wiza.