SalesQL vs Skrapp: Pricing, Accuracy, and the Better Pick
SalesQL and Skrapp both sit at 4.5/5 on G2 - and neither is consistently reliable enough to be your only source of truth. If you're weighing these two, you've probably noticed the same thing we have: some prospectors run both, pull with one, cross-check with the other, then verify before sending. That's not power-user behavior. It's a workaround.
Skrapp has nearly double the G2 reviews (324 vs 166), suggesting wider adoption. But review count doesn't equal accuracy.
30-Second Verdict:
- Pick SalesQL if you're a recruiter who needs personal emails and email-type classification.
- Pick Skrapp if you're an SDR who wants bulk extraction speed with solid CRM sync (see more options in our SDR tools roundup).
What Each Tool Actually Does
SalesQL is a browser-extension-first email finder with a prospecting workflow built around professional profiles, plus built-in enrichment and verification. It classifies emails as personal vs. work, which is especially useful for recruiting. Users report the extension handles 25 profiles per batch, with a beta mode pushing 100-200. You also get CSV enrichment, reverse email lookup, and an email verifier baked in.
Skrapp is built for throughput. We're talking 200M+ professional profiles, 20M+ companies, and bulk extraction at up to 25 profiles per second with a database refreshed daily. It's a speed-first tool designed for SDRs who need volume, not granularity - especially if you're running modern sales prospecting techniques.
Pricing Compared
Credit mechanics matter more than the headline number. Let's break it down.
Skrapp's pricing is public, and their Fair Credit Policy is genuinely good: no charges on duplicates, no credits burned for Invalid/Unknown results, and credits roll over monthly. SalesQL's pricing is also public, with paid tiers at $39/month (Basic), $79/month (Professional), and $119/month (Organization), plus lower per-month pricing on annual billing.
| Tier | SalesQL | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (50 credits/month) | $0 (100 email credits/month) |
| Starter / Pro | $39/mo (Basic) | $30/mo (1,000 email credits/month) |
| Higher tiers | $79-$119/mo | $262/mo (50,000 email credits/month) |
Credit rules to know:
- Skrapp - no charge for Invalid/Unknown, no duplicates charged, rollover credits.
- SalesQL - credit cost varies by action (finder vs. enrichment vs. verifier). Budget more actively here.
If you’re comparing more vendors in this category, it helps to benchmark against broader email search tools and data enrichment services.
Accuracy Head-to-Head
Here's the thing: you're buying probability, not certainty.
Skrapp has unusually clear third-party benchmarks. A 100,000+ record ZeroBounce validation landed Skrapp at 48% valid. A separate 2,500-contact shootout put it at 46% valid. We treat ~46-48% as the real-world range, and that's being generous.
That's why Skrapp's on-page "92% email search success rate" and "97%+ verification accuracy" read like marketing math. "Search success" isn't "deliverable." The 100k test also flagged Skrapp as weak in healthcare and finance - regulated verticals expose shallow datasets fast.
Skrapp's G2 reviews praise ease of use (92 mentions) and fast extraction (37), but "missing/outdated info" (19 mentions) and "inaccurate data" (15) are the top complaints. SalesQL is harder to benchmark externally. G2 reviews consistently praise speed and convenience, then flag outdated data pockets, limited credits, and support friction. Capterra reviews also mention billing disputes. Based on review patterns, we'd estimate SalesQL at 60-70% deliverable in common SMB B2B segments, with variance by geography.
If your average deal size is under $5k, neither tool's accuracy gap will kill you - just verify before sending (and keep an eye on email bounce rate benchmarks). But if you're closing contracts above $25k, a 50% bounce rate is lighting pipeline on fire. Match your data investment to your deal size.
You just saw the numbers: SalesQL hits ~65% deliverable, Skrapp ~48%. That means up to half your list bounces before a single reply. Prospeo's 5-step verification - with catch-all handling, spam-trap removal, and honeypot filtering - delivers 98% email accuracy on a 7-day refresh cycle. No workarounds. No cross-checking two tools.
Pay $0.01 per verified email instead of $0.06 per gamble.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | SalesQL | Skrapp | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Database size | Not disclosed | 200M+ profiles | Skrapp |
| Personal emails | Yes | No | SalesQL |
| Email classification | Yes | Limited | SalesQL |
| Phone numbers | Yes | Weak | SalesQL |
| Bulk extraction | 25-200/batch | 25 profiles/sec | Skrapp |
| CRM integrations | CSV export + basic | HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho, Outreach | Skrapp |
| Verification | Built-in verifier | Fair Credit Policy (credits only for Valid/Catch-all) | Tie |
Skrapp's G2 reviewer base skews small business (69.4% of reviews), so keep that in mind if you're evaluating for a mid-market or enterprise team (especially if you sell enterprise B2B sales).
Who Should Pick Which
Recruiter doing candidate sourcing - SalesQL. Personal emails and email-type classification matter for candidate outreach, and $39/mo is a clean baseline.
SDR doing volume outreach - Skrapp. Faster extraction, more free credits, and real CRM sync keeps lists moving without manual CSV juggling.
Anyone whose bounce rate exceeds 5% - neither tool as your final step. At that point, you're not saving time. You're burning sender reputation, and that damage compounds fast (here’s how to improve sender reputation). The consensus on r/sales threads about email finders is pretty consistent: cheap data costs more in the long run when your domain gets flagged.
Real Cost Per Usable Email
The metric that matters isn't cost per credit. It's cost per usable email after validation - the number most comparison articles conveniently ignore.
| Tool | Cost / 1,000 | Valid rate | $/usable email |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skrapp | $30 | 48% | ~$0.06 |
| SalesQL | $39 | ~65% | ~$0.06 |
| Prospeo | ~$10 | 98% | ~$0.01 |
Skrapp looks cheaper until you price in the 52% that doesn't validate. SalesQL costs more per 1,000, but a higher deliverable rate pulls it to roughly the same usable cost per email. Prospeo sits in a different category - 300M+ professional profiles, 143M+ verified emails, and a proprietary 5-step verification process that includes catch-all handling, spam-trap removal, and honeypot filtering. You're paying for accuracy and 7-day freshness, not gambling on volume.
If you want to go deeper on verification tooling, compare against dedicated options in our Bouncer alternatives guide.
Running both SalesQL and Skrapp to cross-check data isn't a strategy - it's a tax on your pipeline. Prospeo gives you 300M+ profiles, 143M+ verified emails, and 125M+ mobile numbers in one platform with 30+ filters, native CRM integrations, and accuracy that kept Snyk's bounce rate under 5% across 50 AEs.
Replace two mediocre tools with one that actually verifies.
FAQ
Is SalesQL or Skrapp more accurate?
Neither excels. Skrapp benchmarks at 46-48% valid in independent tests, and SalesQL reviews consistently flag outdated data. For teams that need bounce rates under control, Prospeo's 98% verified accuracy on a 7-day refresh cycle is a different ballgame - Snyk cut bounces from 35-40% to under 5% after switching.
Does Skrapp charge for invalid emails?
No. Skrapp only charges credits for Valid and Catch-all results. Invalid and Unknown emails don't consume credits, duplicates aren't charged, and unused credits roll over monthly. It's one of the better credit policies in this space.
Is SalesQL or Skrapp better for recruiting?
SalesQL. It finds and classifies personal emails, which matters when candidates don't check their work inbox. Skrapp focuses on professional emails and doesn't offer personal email coverage.