ReachStream vs Wiza: Pricing, Data & Verdict (2026)
A team of four running high-volume outbound hit the Wiza credit wall last quarter - $0.15 per extra email adds up fast when you're exporting thousands of contacts a month. The consensus on r/coldemail is blunt: Wiza gets expensive at serious prospecting volume. That's the real question behind this comparison - not which tool has more features, but which one won't bleed your budget dry as you scale.
30-Second Verdict
Use ReachStream if your team exports 500+ contacts a month. ReachStream's Glacier plan is $29/mo billed annually and includes 5,000 exports/month, which crushes Wiza's per-user credit model at scale.
Use Wiza if you're a solo rep exporting under 100 contacts a month and you want the smoothest Chrome extension workflow for pulling contacts off professional profiles.
ReachStream vs Wiza at a Glance
| Feature | ReachStream | Wiza |
|---|---|---|
| Database size | 200M+ contacts | 850M+ profiles |
| Verification | Built-in (pay only for valid emails) | Live SMTP |
| Chrome extension | Yes | Yes |
| CRM integrations | HubSpot, Salesforce | HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive |
| Intent data | No | No |
| API access | Yes (ReachAPI) | Team plan |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 (52 reviews) | 4.5/5 (1,143 reviews) |
| Compliance | GDPR | GDPR |
| Data refresh | ~6 weeks (industry average) | Not published |

The review volume gap matters. Wiza's 4.5 rating comes from over a thousand users - that's a battle-tested signal. ReachStream's 4.8 looks great, but 52 reviews means the score could shift with a handful of negative experiences. Neither tool includes intent data, which is a gap for teams running account-based campaigns.
Pricing Breakdown
ReachStream Plans
| Plan | Monthly | Annual | Views/mo | Exports/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Icebreaker | Free | Free | 200 | 100 |
| Glacier | $39/mo | $29/mo | - | 5,000 |
| Ice Floe | $59/mo | $49/mo | - | 10,000 |
| Polar Peak | $99/mo | $79/mo | - | 20,000 |
Credits only get deducted for valid, verified emails - you're not burning budget on bounced addresses (see email bounce rate benchmarks).
Wiza Plans
| Plan | Monthly | Annual | Emails/mo | Phones/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | $0 | 20 | 5 |
| Starter | $49/user/mo | - | 100 | 100 |
| Email (monthly) | $99/user/mo | - | 500 | - |
| Email (annual) | - | $83/mo | Unlimited* | - ($0.35/phone) |
| Email + Phone (monthly) | $199/user/mo | - | 500 | 500 |
| Email + Phone (annual) | - | $166/mo | Unlimited* | Unlimited* |
| Team (3+ users) | - | Starting at $449/mo | Unlimited | Unlimited |
Wiza's annual "unlimited" plans still cap exports at 30,000/year. Read the fine print on that one.
Cost Comparison: Team of 3
We ran the numbers on a realistic mid-volume scenario - 3,000 contacts/month - and the gap is staggering.

Wiza Starter: 3 users x $49/mo = $147 base. Each user gets 100 emails, so 300 total. You need 2,700 more at $0.15 each = $405 in overages. Total: $552/mo.
ReachStream Glacier: 1 account at $29/mo (annual) with 5,000 exports. Total: $29/mo.
Prospeo: At ~$0.01/email, 3,000 contacts runs roughly ~$30/mo - with 98% accuracy included (more on data enrichment services if you're comparing stacks).
That's a 19x cost difference between Wiza and ReachStream for the same volume. If you're a team exporting more than a few hundred contacts a month, Wiza's credit model is actively working against you.

Wiza charges $0.15/email in overages. ReachStream skips intent data entirely. Prospeo delivers 98% accurate emails at ~$0.01 each, with 7-day data refresh and 15,000 intent topics built in - no hidden caps, no overage fees.
Stop overpaying for stale data. Get 75 free emails now.
What Users Actually Say
Wiza on G2
Users love the workflow. Ease of use pulled 427 mentions, and the Chrome extension's integration with professional profiles earned 192 mentions - this is genuinely Wiza's strongest selling point. Contact info gathering came up 322 times (if you're evaluating similar tools, compare against other SDR tools).

But the complaints tell a sharper story. Expensive is the single most common negative theme at 157 mentions. One G2 reviewer put it bluntly: "Credits vanish before the month's halfway done." Limited credits drew 127 mentions - credits don't roll over, and overages stack fast. Inaccurate data appeared 57 times, which is notable for a tool positioned around "verified" emails.
ReachStream on G2
The review base is smaller, but the signal is consistent. Data accuracy is the top positive theme at 17 mentions, followed by lead generation (13) and ease of use (12).
What users flag: integration issues showed up 5 times - CRM syncs with HubSpot and Salesforce don't always work cleanly (if you're mapping your stack, see how to connect outreach tool to CRM). Missing emails (3 mentions) and slow loading (3 mentions) round out the negatives, though the small sample size means these could be edge cases.
The pattern across both tools is clear: Wiza users love the workflow but resent the pricing. ReachStream users like the value but want tighter integrations.
Where Each Tool Wins
ReachStream: The Volume Play
You're exporting 1,000+ contacts a month and cost matters. The pay-for-valid model means you're not subsidizing bounced emails, and the ABM list builder with free contact updates is a nice touch for teams running ongoing account-based campaigns. In our testing, ReachStream's verification held up well at volume - at $29/mo for 5,000 exports, it's hard to find a better cost-per-lead ratio in the category (for broader comparisons, see sales prospecting databases).
Skip ReachStream if you need polished CRM integrations out of the box or if you need a massive review base to feel confident. Fifty-two G2 reviews is still early days, and the integration complaints - while few - are consistent enough to flag.
Wiza: The Solo Prospector's Pick
Here's the thing: Wiza is a genuinely excellent product trapped inside a pricing model that punishes growth. For a solo user or a two-person team exporting under 100 contacts a month, the Chrome extension is the smoothest professional-profile-to-CRM workflow in the space, and at low volumes the credit model doesn't hurt. The free tier (20 emails, 5 phone numbers) is enough to test the workflow before committing (pair it with proven sales prospecting techniques to maximize output).

Skip Wiza if you're scaling past a few hundred exports a month. Credits don't roll over, the "unlimited" annual plans cap at 30,000 exports/year, and overage costs at $0.15/email make high-volume prospecting painful. A tool that markets "unlimited" with a 30,000 cap is telling you something about how they think about pricing transparency.
When Neither Checks Every Box
Neither ReachStream nor Wiza offers intent data or a fast data refresh cycle. If you need to know which accounts are actively researching your category - not just who works there - both tools leave you blind (see identifying buying signals for how teams operationalize this).
Prospeo fills that gap with 300M+ profiles, 98% email accuracy, and 125M+ verified mobile numbers. Data refreshes every 7 days. Intent data spans 15,000 Bombora topics, and 30+ search filters cover buyer intent, technographics, job changes, headcount growth, and funding signals. The free tier gives you 75 emails and 100 Chrome extension credits a month - enough to run a real test before spending anything.


Neither ReachStream nor Wiza refreshes data weekly or tells you which accounts are in-market. Prospeo's 300M+ profiles refresh every 7 days, and Bombora intent data across 15,000 topics shows you who's actively researching your solution.
Get intent data, verified mobiles, and weekly-fresh emails in one platform.
Final Verdict
Most comparison articles refuse to pick a winner. We've run the numbers on both platforms, and the answer depends on exactly one variable: volume.

High-volume teams (1,000+ exports/month): ReachStream. The math isn't close - $29/mo vs hundreds on Wiza. If your average deal size is modest, you probably don't need Wiza-level per-contact pricing eating into your margins.
Solo prospectors (under 100/month): Wiza. The Chrome extension workflow earns its price at low volume. Just don't expect to stay on the free tier for long.
One thing we've seen repeatedly: teams start with Wiza, hit the credit wall within two quarters, then migrate to a flat-rate tool. If you can see that trajectory coming, skip the detour.
FAQ
Is ReachStream cheaper than Wiza?
Yes, dramatically at scale. ReachStream's Glacier plan runs $29/mo billed annually with 5,000 exports/month. Wiza's Starter costs $49/user/mo with just 100 emails and $0.15 per overage. For a team of three exporting 3,000 contacts, ReachStream costs $29/mo versus $552/mo on Wiza.
Does Wiza charge for bounced emails?
Wiza deducts credits when emails are sourced, not when they're delivered. ReachStream only charges for valid, verified emails. If you're running cold outreach at scale, paying for undeliverable data compounds fast - Prospeo also uses a pay-for-valid model with 98% accuracy.
Which tool has better G2 reviews?
ReachStream scores 4.8/5 from 52 reviews. Wiza scores 4.5/5 from 1,143 reviews. ReachStream's rating is higher, but the sample size is 22x smaller. We'd weight Wiza's score more heavily for reliability, while noting ReachStream's early reviewers are enthusiastic.
Can I try both tools for free?
Both offer free tiers. ReachStream's Icebreaker includes 200 email views and 100 exports/month. Wiza's free plan includes 20 emails and 5 phone numbers/month. Prospeo's free tier sits between them at 75 emails and 100 Chrome extension credits - with full enrichment included.
