Skrapp vs Tami AI: Which B2B Data Tool Should You Pick?
Skrapp and Tami AI get lumped together in email finder roundups, but they're fundamentally different tools. One's a screwdriver - fast, cheap, does one thing well. The other's a power drill with attachments you may or may not need. Picking the wrong one wastes credits and months.
30-Second Verdict
Skrapp wins if you just need verified emails fast and cheap. 1,000 email credits/month at $39/mo, no frills, and credits roll over.
Tami AI wins if you need sales intelligence, technographic filtering, and mobile numbers for eCommerce or complex ICP targeting.
Skip both if accuracy is your top priority and you want verified emails plus mobiles without Tami's price tag or Skrapp's email-only limitations. Prospeo delivers 98% email accuracy across 143M+ verified emails and 125M+ verified mobiles, with a 7-day data refresh cycle - and there's a free tier to test before committing.
Here's how these tools break down by category:
- Email finder: Skrapp - fast lookups, light enrichment, low cost per email
- Sales & market intelligence: Tami AI - technographics, eCommerce merchant data, CRM refresh
- Accuracy-first verified data + intent: Prospeo - 98% email accuracy, intent data across 15,000 topics, 50+ enrichment data points
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Skrapp | Tami AI |
|---|---|---|
| Database size | 150M leads; 20M companies | 400M+ contacts; 17M+ companies |
| Email verification / quality | 99% claimed verification accuracy | Under 5% bounce rate |
| Mobile numbers | Not a focus | Separate mobile credits |
| Technographics | No | Yes |
| eCommerce merchant identification | No | 7.7M merchants identified globally |
| Chrome extension | Yes | Yes |
| CRM integrations | HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach, Pipedrive, Zoho | HubSpot, Salesforce, and custom setups |
| Data refresh | Daily (rolling updates) | Company: monthly; contacts: real time |
| Compliance | GDPR compliant | GDPR + ISO 27001 certified |
A quick note on "data refresh." Skrapp says its 150M profiles are refreshed daily, which likely means rolling database updates rather than every record re-verified every 24 hours. Tami refreshes company-level data monthly and triggers contact-level updates in real time when you pull a record. In our experience, the practical difference shows up in bounce rates - stale data means more bounces, regardless of what the vendor's refresh label says.
If you're doing cold email at SMB scale, Skrapp is the better buy. If you sell into eCommerce and need tech stack, payment provider, or shipping partner filters, Tami is the only one of these two that makes sense. They barely overlap in practice.
What Each Tool Actually Does
Skrapp
Skrapp is a straightforward email finder and verifier. Its database covers 20M+ companies and 150M+ leads, and the core workflow is simple: search by name and domain, get a verified email, push it to your CRM. The Chrome extension works across professional profiles and company websites for quick lookups.
Integrations cover HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho, and Outreach. Skrapp markets 99% email verification accuracy and an 85% search success rate. It's built for reps and founders who need emails and nothing else - no technographics, no intent signals, no mobile numbers. Just emails.
Tami AI
Tami AI is a full sales intelligence platform, and the scope is much wider: 400M+ contacts, 17M+ companies, 300M+ active websites scanned, technographic filtering, and eCommerce merchant identification covering 7.7M merchants globally. It also tracks live web signals for company behavior in real time.
Where Tami gets interesting is the data depth. Payment providers, shipping partners, eCommerce tech stacks, visitor traffic - it's all there. Tami also offers AI-powered ICP detection and look-alike discovery built on 90+ TB of processed data. It's GDPR compliant, ISO 27001 certified, and holds a European patent. The CRM refresh feature updates your CRM data in real time, filling missing info, validating emails, tracking job changes, and flagging key changes in your accounts. For teams selling into eCommerce verticals, this level of intelligence is genuinely hard to find elsewhere.
Skrapp caps you at emails. Tami charges double credits for mobiles. Prospeo gives you 143M+ verified emails at 98% accuracy and 125M+ verified mobiles in one platform - with intent data across 15,000 topics and 50+ enrichment data points per contact. All starting at $0.01/email.
Stop paying intelligence-platform prices for data that bounces.
Pricing: Credits and Cost per Lead
| Skrapp Free | Skrapp Professional | Skrapp Enterprise | Tami Free | Tami Basic | Tami Growth | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price/mo | $0 | $39 | $349 | $0 | $55 | $79 |
| Credits | 100 email credits | 1,000 email credits | 50,000 email credits | 50 export + 5 mobile | 250 export + 40 mobile | 500 export + 80 mobile |
| Rollover? | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
The math tells the real story. Skrapp Professional works out to roughly $0.039 per email. Tami Basic runs about $0.22 per export - nearly 6x more expensive per contact. And that's before you factor in Tami's double-credit structure: pulling a mobile number costs a separate mobile credit on top of the export credit. One contact with email plus mobile equals two credits consumed.
Skrapp's credit rollover is a genuine advantage for teams with uneven prospecting volume. We've seen teams burn through Tami credits in the first two weeks of a month, then sit idle because credits reset at the end of each billing cycle. Tami Enterprise pricing isn't published, but based on comparable sales prospecting databases, expect $5k-$25k/year depending on seats and data bundles.
Here's the thing: if your average deal size is under $5k, Tami's per-contact cost is hard to justify. You're paying intelligence-platform prices for data you could get cheaper elsewhere. Skrapp makes more sense at that price point - or better yet, a tool with stronger accuracy at a similar cost.
What Real Users Say
Skrapp: Fast but Thin
Skrapp holds a 4.5/5 on G2 across 324 reviews. Users consistently praise speed and simplicity. One reviewer put it well: "Super easy to use, finds emails quickly - I can prospect a list in minutes." The Chrome extension gets particular love for one-click lookups.
The recurring complaint is accuracy gaps despite the 99% marketing claim. As one reviewer noted: "Some emails come back invalid even after verification - had a few bounces that hurt my sender reputation." Enrichment depth is also limited. You get an email, sometimes a job title, and that's about it.
Tami AI: Deep but Inconsistent
Tami AI sits at 4.3/5 on G2 with 139 reviews and 4.4/5 on Capterra with 131 reviews. Users praise the eCommerce filtering - one Capterra reviewer wrote: "The technographic data and eCommerce merchant identification is unlike anything else I've used."
But the negatives are pointed. One review flags that "contacts can often be from incorrect companies," and another calls out "bad data" and "websites take forever to load." Turnover statistics aren't always accurate either. A thread on r/coldemail described receiving an unsolicited call from Tami using personal phone details, which raised questions about their data sourcing practices.
Let's be honest - we've seen teams torch their deliverability when they trust "verified" labels without running a second check. Both tools have documented accuracy issues on review sites, so if email deliverability is a KPI you track, build in a verification step regardless of which tool you choose.
Who Should Pick Which
Pick Skrapp if you're a solo founder or small team running cold email campaigns and you need cheap, fast email lookups. You don't care about technographics or mobile numbers. You want credits that roll over. Budget: under $50/mo.
Pick Tami AI if you're doing market research, selling into eCommerce verticals, or need technographic and mobile data alongside CRM refresh. You're willing to pay more per contact for richer intelligence. Budget: $55-$79/mo minimum, and you'll use every credit before the month resets.
Skip Tami if you're a lean outbound team that just needs accurate contact data. The intelligence features are impressive, but they're wasted if your workflow is "find email, send sequence, repeat." You'd be paying for a power drill when a screwdriver does the job.
If Neither Fits
Both Skrapp and Tami users flag the same frustration in reviews: data that looks verified but still bounces. That's the gap Prospeo fills. The numbers: 98% email accuracy, 143M+ verified emails, 125M+ verified mobiles, and a 7-day data refresh cycle while many providers refresh every four to six weeks. The database covers 300M+ professional profiles with 30+ search filters, including buyer intent across 15,000 topics and technographics. Pricing starts at roughly $0.01 per email, with a free tier of 75 emails plus 100 Chrome extension credits per month - no card required.
If you want to pressure-test bounce risk before you scale, pair any finder with an email deliverability checklist and track your email bounce rate weekly.
Both Skrapp and Tami have documented accuracy issues on G2 and Capterra. Prospeo's 5-step verification with catch-all handling, spam-trap removal, and a 7-day data refresh cycle means your bounce rate stays under control - not your sender reputation.
Test 75 free emails and see what 98% accuracy actually looks like.
FAQ
Are Skrapp and Tami AI the same type of tool?
No. Skrapp is an email finder built for fast, cheap email lookups and verification. Tami AI is a sales intelligence platform with technographic data, mobile numbers, eCommerce merchant filtering, and CRM refresh. They serve fundamentally different workflows - Skrapp for simple outbound email, Tami for market research and complex ICP targeting.
Does Tami AI roll over unused credits?
Tami's monthly credits reset at the end of each billing cycle - unused credits are lost. Skrapp credits do roll over, making it significantly better for teams with inconsistent prospecting volume or seasonal outreach patterns.
Which tool has the most accurate email data?
Both Skrapp (99% claimed verification accuracy) and Tami (under 5% bounce rate) market strong numbers, but G2 and Capterra reviews for both flag real data quality issues including bounced emails and incorrect company associations. Prospeo's 98% email accuracy with a 7-day refresh cycle and proprietary 5-step verification process delivers the most consistently reliable data of the three.